Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;48:882-889

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WHITE, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by BUCKLEY, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WHITE, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by BUCKLEY, M. J.

(Circulation. 1973;48:882.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cineradiographic Evaluation of Prosthetic Cardiac Valves

ALAN F. WHITE M.D.1; ROBERT E. DINSMORE M.D.1; MORTIMER J. BUCKLEY M.D.1

1 From the Department of Radiology and the Department of Surgery (Cardiovascular Unit), Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Forty-nine patients whose clinical symptoms suggested a leaking cardiac prosthetic valve were studied by both cineradiography and angiocardiography. We found a wider range of tilting motion of the nonleaking mitral valve than has been previously shown. An angle of tilt greater than 6° for the prosthetic aortic valve strongly suggests separation of the prosthesis from its bed with a paravalvular leak, while the angle of tilt suggestive of a paravalvular leak for a prosthetic mitral valve is 12°. However, a tilt of less than these values does not entirely exclude the existence of a leak. We strongly suggest that routine cineradiography be done in each patient shortly after surgery, as a basis for comparison if the patient later develops a murmur or congestive heart failure.


Key Words: Aortic valve, prosthetic • Paravalvular leak • Mitral valve, prosthetic • Angiocardiography • Valvular tilt

Submitted on April 9, 1973
Accepted on May 14, 1973




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. Sands Jr, C. N. Leach Jr, A. S. Lachman, and H. Levine
Thrombosis of the Bjork-Shiley Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Recognition and Management
JAMA, September 22, 1978; 240(13): 1411 - 1413.
[Abstract] [PDF]