This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by HAMMERMEISTER, K. E. Articles by WARBASSE, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by HAMMERMEISTER, K. E. Articles by WARBASSE, J. R.

(Circulation. 1974;49:729.)
© 1974 American Heart Association, Inc.

---

The Rate of Change of Left Ventricular Volume in Man

I. Validation and Peak Systolic Ejection Rate in Health and Disease

K. E. HAMMERMEISTER M.D.¹; R. C. BROOKS B.E.E.¹; J. R. WARBASSE M.D.¹

¹ From the Cardiovascular Service and Laboratories, and Health Services Research Branch, United States Public Health Service Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, and the Cardiology Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Denver, Colorado.

The rate of left ventricular volume change (dV/dt) is by definition left ventricular ejection rate during systole and filling rate during diastole, and in the absence of valvular regurgitation or intracardiac shunts, is equal to systolic aortic valve flow and diastolic mitral valve flow respectively. A computerized technique for the calculation of instantaneous left ventricular dV/dt from cineangiographically measured left ventricular volume is presented. Curve smoothing was accomplished by passing a second degree polynomial through nine consecutive volume points using the least squares technique. Validity of this technique was demonstrated by the high degree of correlation of systolic dV/dt with instantaneous ascending aortic blood velocity (flow) measured simultaneously with an electromagnetic catheter-tip velocity transducer in ten patients.

Peak left ventricular systolic ejection rate (S dV/dt) was calculated from single plane cineangiographically measured left ventricular volumes in 113 adult patients and related to other measures of cardiovascular function. Mean S dV/dt for the group of 29 normal patients was 427 ± 129 cc per second and was not significantly different in patients with coronary artery disease (21), aortic stenosis (13), mitral stenosis (11), or cardiomyopathy (9), but was increased significantly in patients with valvular regurgitation (19). S dV/dt correlates poorly with the ejection fraction and with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and is not a reliable measure of left ventricular function. The primary determinant of S dV/dt appears to be total left ventricular stroke volume. When S dV/dt is divided by end-diastolic volume (EDV), the resultant S dV/dt/EDV correlates well with peak normalized circumferential fiber shortening rate (r = 0.89, P < 0.01) and with ejection fraction (r = 0.69, P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient of S dV/dt/DV with LVEDP was r = 0.36 ( P < 0.01) and with arterio-venous oxygen difference, r = 0.38 (P < 0.01). Thus, S dV/dt/EDV appears to be a measure of ventricular function. S dV/dt occurs in midsystole in normal subjects and in patients with mitral regurgitation and is not delayed in patients with aortic stenosis. The three patients with idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis appeared to have characteristic changes in the left ventricular ejection rate curve with an increase in S dV/dt (and especially S dV/dt/EDV), with S dV/dt occurring earlier in systole than normal.

Key Words: Left ventricular ejection rate • Left ventricular function • Peak systolic dV/dt • Quantitative angiocardiography • Left ventricular dV/dt • Aortic blood flow • Velocity transducer • Cineangiography • Left ventricular volume

Submitted on January 24, 1973
Accepted on December 11, 1973

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Brodoefel, U. Kramer, A. Reimann, C. Burgstahler, S. Schroeder, A. Kopp, and M. Heuschmid Dual-Source CT with Improved Temporal Resolution in Assessment of Left Ventricular Function: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1064 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]