Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1952;5:567-576

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by WAYNE, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by WAYNE, H. H.

(Circulation. 1952;5:567.)
© 1952 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vasodilator Effects of a Substance Present in Normal Human Urine in Comparison with the Effect of Methacholine and Sodium Nitrite

A Statistical Analysis of Reliability of the Method of Assay

HAROLD D. GREEN M.D.1; J. MAXWELL LITTLE Ph.D.1; CLIFFORD G. GADDY M.D.1; LEWIS T. FRANKLIN M.D.1; HOWARD H. WAYNE B.A.1

1 From the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest College, Winston-Salem, N. C.

This paper presents a method for bioassay of vasotropic substances. Data on the accuracy of the method are presented in terms of the response to repeated injections of methacholine. Some of the factors affecting the response to methacholine are analyzed. The peripheral vasodilator effect of a nondialyzable substance present in human urine is demonstrated and the effectiveness of this substance is related to that of methacholine.