Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:477-484

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Triebwasser, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Triebwasser, J. H.

Circulation, Vol 51, 477-484, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block

M Rotman and JH Triebwasser

The experience with bundle branch block at the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine was reviewed. The clinical and follow-up status was evaluated in 394 subjects with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 125 subjects with left bundle branch block (LBBB). The majority of subjects were asymptomatic at the time of bundle branch block diagnosis. The subjects were divided into subfroups based on electrocardiographic (EEG) findings to determine if any one subfroup was at higher risk for initial or follow-up morbidity of cardiobascular disease or follow-up mortality. At initial diagnosis and clinical evaluation, 94% of RBBB and 89% of LBBB subjects had no evidence of cardiobascular disease. In the RBBB group, 3 and 2% had cornary heart disease and hypertension, respectively; in LBBB subjects, 9 and 7% had cornary heart disease and hypertension, respectively. No one ECG subfroup in either the RBBB or LBBB group had a higher incidence of cardiobascular disease. Complete follow-up information was available in 94% of the RBBB subgroup subjects and 91% of the LBBB group. In the follow-up period, new cases of coronary heart disease and hypertension occurred in 6% of the RBBB group and 5 and 8%, respectively, in the LBBB group. Fourteen (4%) RBBB and nine (8%) LBBB subjects died during the follow-up period. No differences for follow-up groups. Progressive electrical dysfunction in the form of complete heart block occurred in one subject each absence, and degree of associated cardiobascular disease. Furthermore, within the age limits of the present aeromedical implications of bundle block are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Ghostine, C. Caussin, B. Daoud, M. Habis, E. Perrier, D. Pesenti-Rossi, A. Sigal-Cinqualbre, C.-Y. Angel, B. Lancelin, A. Capderou, et al.
Non-Invasive Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1929 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Wieneke, K. Sattler, C. von Birgelen, D. Bose, M. Haude, W. Rechenberg, S. Sack, N. Dagres, and R. Erbel
Impact of intraventricular conduction delay on coronary haemodynamics: a study with intracoronary Doppler in patients with bundle branch blocks and normal coronary arteries.
Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Eriksson, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Rosengren
Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years: The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2300 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
L. Padeletti, M. Giaccardi, F. Turreni, N. Musilli, A. Colella, P. Pieragnoli, A. Michelucci, G. Ricciardi, and M. C. Porciani
Influence of QRS prolongation on the natural history of CHF
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2004; 6(suppl_D): D79 - D82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Crow, P. J. Hannan, and A. R. Folsom
Prognostic Significance of Corrected QT and Corrected JT Interval for Incident Coronary Heart Disease in a General Population Sample Stratified by Presence or Absence of Wide QRS Complex: The ARIC Study With 13 Years of Follow-Up
Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1985 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
G Breithardt, H Kuhn, D Hammel, H.-H Scheld, L Seipel, and D. Bocker
Cardiac resynchronization therapy into the next decade: from the past to morbidity/mortality trials
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2002; 4(suppl_D): D102 - D110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Eriksson, P.-O. Hansson, H. Eriksson, and M. Dellborg
Bundle-Branch Block in a General Male Population : The Study of Men Born 1913
Circulation, December 1, 1998; 98(22): 2494 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. H. Newby, E. Pisano, M. W. Krucoff, C. Green, and A. Natale
Incidence and Clinical Relevance of the Occurrence of Bundle-Branch Block in Patients Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2424 - 2428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. de Meeus, E. Stephan, S. Debrus, M.-K. Jean, J. Loiselet, J. Weissenbach, J. Demaille, and P. Bouvagnet
An Isolated Cardiac Conduction Disease Maps to Chromosome 19q
Circ. Res., October 1, 1995; 77(4): 735 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text]