Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:485-491

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DuBrow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DuBrow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, A. R.

Circulation, Vol 51, 485-491, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Comparison of cardiac refractory periods in children and adults

W DuBrow, EA Fisher, G Amaty-Leon, P Denes, D Wu, K Rosen and AR Hastreiter

Atrial (A) and A-V nodal (AVN) effective and functional refractory periods (ERP & FRP) were determined by atrial extrastimulus technique in 40 children, aged 7 months to 16 years, with normal P-R intervals and QRS durations. These data were compared to adult data at longest cycle lengths (CL) assuring atrial capture. All values are listed in msec as means plus or minus standard errors of the means. CL was 566 plus or minus 15 in children and 699 plus or minus 29 in adults (P less than .001). Refractory periods (RP) in children and adults were, respectively: AERP 196 plus or minus 9 and 239 plus or minus 13 (P less than .01), AFRP 225 plus or minus 8 and 284 plus or minus 11 (P less than .001), AVNERP 239 plus or minus 11 and 293 plus or minus 7 (P smaller than .001), AVNFRP 360 plus or minus 13 and 403 plus or minus 7 (P smaller than .005). RP were then compared at three equivalent CL ranges: CL1, 850-600; CL2 599-460; CL3 459-280. The following RP were significantly shorter in children (P smaller than .05-.001): AERP, AFRP, AVENERP and AVNFRP at CL2 and CL3. RP of the bundle branches were compared and tended to be shorter in children. In conclusion, atrial and A-V nodal ERP and FRP are shorter in children than adults. This shortening is only partially related to the shorter CL in children. These data are germane to understanding the maturation of the conduction system in man.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. M. Kistler, P. Sanders, S. P. Fynn, I. H. Stevenson, S. J. Spence, J. K. Vohra, P. B. Sparks, and J. M. Kalman
Electrophysiologic and electroanatomic changes in the human atrium associated with age
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. A. Glatter, P. C. Dorostkar, Y. Yang, R. J. Lee, G. F. Van Hare, E. Keung, G. Modin, and M. M. Scheinman
Electrophysiological Effects of Ibutilide in Patients With Accessory Pathways
Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1933 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Amellal and J. Billette
Selective Functional Properties of Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Inputs: Role in Nodal Conduction, Refractoriness, Summation, and Rate-Dependent Function in Rabbit Heart
Circulation, August 15, 1996; 94(4): 824 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text]