Circulation, Vol 51, 677-688, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association
TH Kreulen, AA Bove, MT McDonough, MJ Sands and JF Spann
Comparisons of the sensitivities of parameters for assessing left
ventricular performance in man were made in 38 patients. The parameters
compared were the ejection fraction, ventriculographic contraction
patterns, the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and the contractile
indices including the contractile element velocity at 10 mm Hg (Vce 10) and
maximal contractile element velocity (Vmax). The contractile indices were
obtained by catheter tip manometry, utilizing developed pressure (DP) to
calculate the velocity of contractile element shortening (Vce) from the
formula: dp/dt divided by 32 DP. Vce 10 was measured directly and Vmax was
derived by linear manual extrapolation of the pressure-velocity plot to 0
mm Hg. Vmax values derived from linear manual extrapolation were compared
with values obtained by computer least squares fitting of the Vce and
developed pressure data points to single and double exponential equations.
The Vce and developed pressure data points fit the single exponential
equation better than the double exponential equation but the use of either
equation resulted in slightly higher values for Vmax than obtained with
linear manual extrapolation. The effect of heart rate on myocardial
contractility was eliminated by making comparisons at both a basal and
atrial paced rate of 100. Utilizing all methods, 24 patients were
identified to have ventricular dysfunction. The contractile indices were
significantly less sensitive than any other parameter (P smaller than 0.05)
and identified seven patients while the left ventricular end-diastolic
pressure, ejection fraction, and presence of asynergy identified 15, 15,
and 12 patients, respectively. The use of a common atrial paced rate of 100
did not increase the sensitivity of the contractile indices. Since there
was only partial overlapping between parameters in the identification of
left ventricular dysfunction, the combination of different parameters was
more sensitive than any single parameter alone. It is concluded that
several methods are required to identify all patients with left ventricular
dysfunction and that the contractile indices are the least sensitive
indicator of left ventricular dysfunction.
ARTICLES
The evaluation of left ventricular function in man. A comparison of methods
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Connelly, D. L. Prior, D. J. Kelly, M. P. Feneley, H. Krum, and R. E. Gilbert Load-sensitive measures may overestimate global systolic function in the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy: a comparison with load-insensitive measures Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1699 - H1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Carabello Evolution of the Study of Left Ventricular Function: Everything Old Is New Again Circulation, June 11, 2002; 105(23): 2701 - 2703. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. De Wolf, L. Foubert, Y. Van Belleghem, K. Mareels, D. Matthys, H. Verhaaren, and G. Van Nooten The influence of low afterload on the nature of the stress-velocity relationship J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1219 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Hill, W. R. Chitwood Jr, J. D. Sink, J. L. Cox, and A. S. Wechsler Perioperative Assessment of Segmental Left Ventricular Function in Man: Effects of Nitroprusside After Bypass Operations Arch Surg, May 1, 1980; 115(5): 609 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Chilton, R. A. Oliveros, B. S. Stutts, C. H. Beckmann, and C. A. Boucher Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals: Left Ventricular Performance in Coronary Artery Disease Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1980; 140(2): 240 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1975 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |