Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:689-700

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinones, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinones, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. K.

Circulation, Vol 51, 689-700, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular stress-velocity relations

MA Quinones, WH Gaasch, JS Cole and JK Alexander

The time course of left ventricular (LV) circumferential stress and fiber shortening velocity (Vcf) were determined at 20 msec intervals in 30 patients from simultaneous recordings of LV pressure (micromanometer) and LV dimensions (echography). In 12 patients with normal LV function, endocardial and midwall maximal (max) Vcf, Vcf at peak stress, and endocardial mean Vcf were significantly greater than in eight patients with myocardial disease. Peak stress was less in the normal subjects (mean equal 241 gl/cm2, range 180 to 310 g/cm2) than in those with myocardial diseases (mean equals 371 g/cm2, range 280 to 513 g/cm2). Vcf was reduced in five out of seven patients with chronic LV volume overload, while peak stress ranged from normal in three to increased in four. Max Vcf, mean Vcf, and peak stress were normal in three patients with chronic LV pressure overload; Vcf at peak stress was normal in two. Good correlation was observed between angiographic determinations of mean Vcf and endocardial max Vcf, Vcf at peak stress and mean Vcf. Induced changes in preload in five patients (dextran infusion at constant heart rate) produced a 12.2 per cent increase in peak stress (P small than 0.05), and insignificant changes in max Vcf (3.7 per cent increase, P = NS), in Vcf at peak stress (5 per cent decrease, P smaller than 0.05), in mean Vcf (0.7 per cent increase, P = NS). Increasing afterload with angiotensin in seven patients (peak stress increased by 45 per cent, P smaller than 0.01) reduced max Vcf, Vcf at peak stress and mean Vcf by 33 per cent, 39 per cent respectively. Lowering afterload in one patient (amyl nitrite) produced an increase in Vcf. Improvement in Vcf was observed in all instances during positive inotropic stimulation (isoproterenol in three normals, digoxin in four with myocardial disease). Thre response of endocardial and midwall Vcf to loading and contractility were similar. In man Vcf is an index of myocardial contractility which is affected minimally by changes in preload but responds inversely to changes in afterload. Its sensitivity to acute afterload changes may, at times, limit its clinical applicability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin, J. R. Pepper, D. G. Gibson, and M. H. Yacoub
Early changes in the time course of myocardial contraction after correcting aortic regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. M. Mone, S. P. Sanders, and S. D. Colan
Control Mechanisms for Physiological Hypertrophy of Pregnancy
Circulation, August 15, 1996; 94(4): 667 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. M. Behrendt
Use and Misuse of the Ejection Fraction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1166 - 1168.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Wagner, M. J. Morton, K. A. Johnson, J. P. O'Grady, and L. Speroff
Terbutaline and Maternal Cardiac Function
JAMA, December 11, 1981; 246(23): 2697 - 2701.
[Abstract] [PDF]