Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:718-722

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.

Circulation, Vol 51, 718-722, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Augmentation of myocardial digoxin concentration in hemorrhagic shock

BL Lloyd and RR Taylor

The effect of the shock state on myocardial digoxin uptake and plasma digoxin levels was examined in unanesthetized dogs following hemorrhage. Five minutes after intravenous administration of tritiated digoxin the myocardial digoxin content in animals with shock was greater than in normal animals in both left ventricle (LV) (165 plus or minus 15 (SD) ng/g vs 130 plus or minus 26 ng/g, P smaller than 0.02 and right ventricle (RV) (142 plus or minus 13 ng/g vs 111 plus or minus 22 ng/g. P smaller than 0.02) as was the plasma digoxin concentration (61.6 plus or minus 11.8 ng/ml vs 44.3 plus or minus 4.6 ng/ml, P smaller than 0.02). After one hour, in another group of dogs, the difference in myocardial concentration of digoxin between test and normal groups was even greater (LV: 213 plus or minus 26 ng/g vs 133 plus or minus 13 ng/g, P smaller than 0.001; RV: 171 plus or minus 9 ng/g vs 111 plus or minus 8 ng/g. P smaller than 0.001) despite lower plasma digoxin concentration in the test group (12.9 plus or minus 2.9 ng/ml vs 17.3 plus or minus 2.5 ng/ml, P smaller than 0.05). Diminished peripheral blood flow, peripheral digoxin delivery and uptake were probably responsible for the early difference in plasma digoxin levels. Resultant greater plasma concentrations of digoxin presented to the myocardium in the early phase, coupled with relative preservation of myocardial blood flow, may explain the greater myocardial uptake in animals with shock although myocardial mechanical factors may also be implicated. Augmented uptake of digoxin by the myocardium in canine hemorrhagic shock may be relevant to the altered susceptibility to glycoside action in clinical shock syndromes.