Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:1101-1106

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Littler, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sleight, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Littler, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sleight, P.

Circulation, Vol 51, 1101-1106, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Continuous recording of direct arterial pressure in unrestricted patients. Its role in the diagnosis and management of high blood pressure

WA Littler, AJ Honour, DJ Pugsley and P Sleight

We have compared casual indirect measurements of arterial pressure obtained 1) by the general practitioner (GP) and 2) in the outpatient clinic (OPC) with 24 hour continuous recording of direct arterial pressure in two selected group of unrestricted patients. 1) Eight asymptomatic, untreated patients with suspected hypertension. 2) Eight asymptomatic, treated patients whose indirect pressure readings seemed inappropriately high when considered against a general absence of target organ damage. Both groups showed that usually there was good agreement between arterial pressure recorded indirectly by GP and OPC while continuous recording showed wide variability of systolic and diastolic pressures over 24 hours and a significant fall during sleep. The first groups with suspected hypertension showed that the indirect measurements were not significantly different from the 24 hour direct recording. The second group of patients on treatment for hypertension showed a discrepancy, the direct readings being significantly lower than the indirect. This difference (approixmately 30 mm Hg mean arterial pressure) would explain the lack of target organ damage and may have been due to the effect of exercise augmenting the hypotensive action of drugs or due to a well developed defense reflex which biased the indirect readings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. L. Malinow, J. J. Lynch, S. A. Thomas, E. Friedmann, and J. M. Long
Automated Blood Pressure Recording: The Phenomenon of Blood Pressure Elevations During Speech
Angiology, July 1, 1982; 33(7): 474 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. G. Pickering, G. A. Harshfield, H. D. Kleinert, S. Blank, and J. H. Laragh
Blood Pressure During Normal Daily Activities, Sleep, and Exercise: Comparison of Values in Normal and Hypertensive Subjects
JAMA, February 19, 1982; 247(7): 992 - 996.
[Abstract] [PDF]