This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wu, D. Articles by Rosen, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wu, D. Articles by Rosen, K. M.

Circulation, Vol 52, 789-798, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Demonstration of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways utilizing a ventricular extrastimulus in patients with atrioventricular nodal re- entrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

D Wu, P Denes, C Wyndham, F Amat-y-Leon, RC Dhingra and KM Rosen

In patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal re-entrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), atrial extrastimulus technique frequently reveals discontinuous A1-A2, H1-H2 curves suggestive of dual A-V nodal pathways. To further test the hypothesis that these curves in fact reflect dual A-V nodal pathways, a ventricular extrastimulus (VS) was coupled either to A2 at a fixed A1-A2 interval which reliably produced an A-V nodal re-entrant atrial echo (E) with a constant A2-E interval in two patients, or to QRS complex (V) during sustained PSVT with a constant E-E interval in one patient. Three response zones were defined: at longer A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS manifested no effect on the timing of E (Zone 1). At closer A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS conducted to the atrium, shortening the apparent A2-E or E- E interval (Zone 2). At shortest A2-VS or V-VS coupling interval, VS was blocked retrogradely, and no E was induced (Zone 3). The ability of VS to preempt control of the atria (Zone 2 response) strongly suggests the presence of dual A-V nodal pathways in these PSVT patients. If only a single pathway were present, VS would of necessity collide with the antegrade impulse and could not reach the atria. The Zone 3 response occurs because of retrograde refractoriness of the fast pathway. Failure of the echo during Zone 3 probably reflects concealed conduction to the fast pathway, or possibly interference in the slow pathway.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W.-T. Lai, C.-S. Lee, S.-H. Sheu, Y.-S. Hwang, and R. J. Sung Electrophysiological Manifestations of the Excitable Gap of Slow-Fast AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Demonstrated by Single Extrastimulation Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 66 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text]