Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;52:848-853

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falsetti, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falsetti, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, M. L.

Circulation, Vol 52, 848-853, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Temporal heterogeneity of myocardial blood flow in anesthetized dogs

HL Falsetti, RJ Carroll and ML Marcus

Temporal variation in perfusion to small segments of the myocardium was studied in 19 opened-chest dogs. In six control dogs, three or four differently labeled 7-10 mu microspheres were injected simultaneously into the left atrium to assess the variability in measured myocardial perfusion due to the microsphere technique. In 13 other dogs, microspheres were injected four times at 5 minute intervals while various hemodynamics parameters (mean aortic pressure, peak systolic pressure, heart rate, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and Vmax) were stable (less than 10% variation in any one parameter). The left ventricles were divided into 96 segments, the mean weight+/- SD of each segment was 0.95+/-0.17 grams. The flow to each segment was expressed as a percent of the mean flow of the three or four measured flows to that segment, and the difference between the largest and the smallest percent of each segment was taken as a measure of the variability of flow to that segment. The average variability of segmental flow (mean +/-SD) when the three to four differently labeled microspheres were injected was 14.0+/-4.7; and the variability when differently labeled microspheres injected sequentially was 31.0+/-10.8% (P less than 0.001). Furthermore, in the sequentially injected animals the magnitude of temporal variation was similar in various subdivisions of the ventricle (layers, walls, apex to base). The mean and standard deviation of the variability of flow to the endo, mid, and epicardial layers were 28.7+/-10.2, 30.0+/-11.3 and 34.5+/-12.4%, respectively. These changes may reflect either spontaneous or local autoregulatory changes in precapillary sphincters or arterioles.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Kostelec, J. Covell, G. D. Buckberg, A. Sadeghi, J. I.E. Hoffman, and G. S. Kassab
Myocardial protection in the failing heart: I. Effect of cardioplegia and the beating state under simulated left ventricular restoration
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 875 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. S. Kassab, M. Kostelec, G. D. Buckberg, J. Covell, A. Sadeghi, and J. I.E. Hoffman
Myocardial protection in the failing heart: II. Effect of pulsatile cardioplegic perfusion under simulated left ventricular restoration
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 884 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M Mansaray, P.R Belcher, I Vergroesen, Z.M Wright, J.W Hynd, A.J Drake-Holland, and M.I.M Noble
Downstream resistance effects of intracoronary thrombosis in the stenosed canine coronary artery
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1999; 42(1): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Z. Linka, D. M. Skyba, R. J. Price, K. Wei, T. C. Skalak, and S. Kaul
Spontaneous redistribution after reperfusion: A unique property of AIP 201, an ultrasound contrast agent
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1765 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. D. Kasprzak, W. B. Vletter, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, J. R. van Meegen, R. Johnson, and F. J. Ten Cate
Visualization and quantification of myocardial mass at risk using three-dimensional contrast echocardiography
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1998; 40(2): 314 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Ghaleh, Y.-T. Shen, and S. F. Vatner
Spatial Heterogeneity of Myocardial Blood Flow Presages Salvage Versus Necrosis With Coronary Artery Reperfusion in Conscious Baboons
Circulation, November 1, 1996; 94(9): 2210 - 2215.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Hasdai, L. Fuchs, D. Ohad, and A. Battler
The Applicability of Color-Labeled Microspheres in a Rabbit Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion
Angiology, June 1, 1994; 45(6): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]