Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;52:894-900

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alderman, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alderman, E. L.

Circulation, Vol 52, 894-900, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Analysis of left ventricular function in response to afterload changes in patients with mitral stenosis

JL Bolen, MG Lopes, DC Harrison and EL Alderman

In order to assess left ventricular function in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, left ventricular function curves (plotting stroke work index vs left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) were constructed using angiotensin to augment, and nitroprusside to reduce, afterload. Hemodynamic responses to these alterations in afterload were measured. Resting ejection fractions and qualitative assessment of left ventricular angiographic contraction abnormalities were also determined. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure following afterload interventions could be linearly related to changes in mean aortic pressure, but mitral valve gradients were unaffected. Afterload reduction with nitroprusside did not augment cardiac output. Afterload elevation with angiotensin significantly depressed both cardiac output and calculated mitral valve areas. Patients with normal resting ejection fractions evidenced normal ventricular function curves and those with depressed ejection fractions showed flat or declining function curves. Contraction abnormalities, generally in the posterobasal area, correlated well with abnormal left ventricular function curves.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. I. Fann, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Disease
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 973 - 1012.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. I. Fann, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Disease
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 901 - 931.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
L. Gould, S. Patel, G.I. Gomes, and C.V.R. Reddy
Paradoxical Response to the Vasodilators
Angiology, February 1, 1982; 33(2): 125 - 130.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
L. Gould and C.V.R. Reddy
Hemodynamic Effects of Phentolamine in Mitral Stenosis and Congestive Cardiomyopathy
Angiology, July 1, 1979; 30(7): 498 - 504.
[PDF]