This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wu, D. Articles by Rosen, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wu, D. Articles by Rosen, K. M.

Circulation, Vol 53, 456-464, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Electrophysiological and clinical observations in patients with alternating bundle branch block

D Wu, P Denes, RC Dhingra, F Amat-Y-Leon, CR Wyndham, R Chuquimia and KM Rosen

Electrophysiological studies (His bundle recordings and atrial stimulation) were performed in nine patients who manifested periods of both right and left bundle branch block (RBBB and LBBB). In seven of the patients, alternating bundle branch block appeared to reflect intermittent or chronic bundle branch block superimposed on incomplete (but electrocardiographically complete) block of the contralateral bundle branch. In three of these seven, shift from one bundle branch block pattern to the other was associated with reproducible change in H- V (mean change 30 msec), and could be induced by alteration of cardiac rate with carotid massage, coupled atrial stimulation, and rapid atrial pacing. In one of the seven, RBBB with a P-R of 0.20 seconds preceded chronic LBBB with a P-R of 0.24 seconds, implying that RBBB had been incomplete. In three of the seven, although a definite mechanism of alternation could not be demonstrated, transient contralateral bundle branch block occurred superimposed on chronic ipsilateral bundle branch block, implying that the ipsilateral block was incomplete. Two patients manifested periods of narrow QRS, LBBB, RBBB, and paroxysmal A-V block. Based upon pathological data (one case), this pattern appeared to reflect a lesion involving the distal His bundle and proximal bundle branches. In the total group of patients, clinical course was primarily determined by the severity of heart disease and not by occurrence of A- V block. The conduction defect in the majority of patients was surprisingly benign.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Konno, M. Shimizu, H. Ino, T. Araki, M. Yamaguchi, M. Inoue, Y. Tofuku, and H. Mabuchi A Rare Type of Alternating Bundle Branch Block in a Patient with Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Case report Angiology, January 1, 2005; 56(1): 115 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]