This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Strauss, H. C. Articles by Giardina, E. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Strauss, H. C. Articles by Giardina, E. G.

Circulation, Vol 53, 763-776, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Electrophysiologic evaluation of sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction

HC Strauss, JT Bigger, AL Saroff and EG Giardina

Twenty patients of mean age 66.2 years, with suspected sinus node dysfunction, underwent extensive electrophysiologic study. Sinus bradycardia (18), sinus pauses (3), and sinoatrial block (1) were identified in their ECGs prior to study. Also 11 patients had some abnormality of atrioventricular nodal and/or intraventricular conduction prior to study. At the time of electrophysiological study, 10/20 patients (50%) had a mean cycle length exceeding 1000 msec, and mean P-V interval exceeded 210 msec in 7/20 (35%). The estimated "sinoatrial conduction time" exceeded 215 msec in 6/16 (38%) patients. The maximum first escape cycle following pacing at six different rates exceeded a value equal 1.3 X the mean value of the control cycle length + 101 msec (slope of regression line + Y intercept + 1 SD) in 13/9 (68%) patients. Nineteen patients received 1 mg atropine intravenously and mean cycle length decreased by 19%, from 891 +/- 175.8 msec to 718 +/- 182.9 msec. Graded infusion of isoproterenol was employed in 19 patients; four patients required an infusion rate greater than 28.3 ng/kg/min to produce a 20% decrease in spontaneous sinus cycle length. These data would indicate that a variety of interventions are required to characterize the disturbance of sinus node automaticiy and sinoatrial conduction in patients with sinus node dysfunction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N Saoudi, F Cosio, A Waldo, S.A Chen, Y Iesaka, M Lesh, S Saksena, J Salerno, and W Schoels A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases. A Statement from a Joint Expert Group from the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2001; 22(14): 1162 - 1182. [PDF]

				A. Elvan, K. Wylie, and D. P. Zipes Pacing-Induced Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Impairs Sinus Node Function in Dogs: Electrophysiological Remodeling Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2953 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. He-Chang The Provocative Test and Their Diagnostic Value in Sinus Node Failure Angiology, August 1, 1984; 35(8): 480 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]