Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1976;54:447-451

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danzig, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dock, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danzig, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dock, D. S.

Circulation, Vol 54, 447-451, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Earlier onset of QRS in anterior precordial ECG leads: precision of time interval measurements

MD Danzig, TL Robertson, LS Webber, G Day and DS Dock

Onset of QRS was compared between simultaneously recorded conventional ECG leads in 84 subjects with clinically normal hearts from a defined population sample. Mean onset of QRS was 6.4 msec earlier in lead V1 and 7.4 msec earlier in V2 than in lead II. These differences were statistically significant. The measuring system was adapted from drafting techniques and took into account variations in paper speed which occurred during recording. Interobserver differences equivalent to greater than 1 msec occurred in 3.9% of timeline measurements, but in in 38% of QRS onset measurements. The lower precision in measuring QRS onset may be attributed to baseline oscillations and to the relatively slow rate of voltage change at the onset of ventricular depolarization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
B. Tyl, M. Kabbaj, B. Fassi, P. De Jode, and W. Wheeler
Comparison of Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods for QT Measurement During a Thorough QT/QTc Study: Variability and Sample Size Considerations
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 49(8): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]