Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1976;54:452-459

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, A. G.

Circulation, Vol 54, 452-459, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Electrophysiologic effects of propranolol on sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction

HC Strauss, M Gilbert, RH Svenson, HC Miller and AG Wallace

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenously administered propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) on three parameters of sinus node function were examined in ten symptomatic patients with sinus node dysfunction. The patients ranged in age from 26 to 79 years. Symptoms ranged from fatigue to frank syncope. Sinoatrial (SA) block and sinus pauses were observed in one patient; sinus pauses alone were observed in three patients. Five (5/10) patients had intraatrial block; three (3/10) patients had atrioventricular block; four (4/10) patients had an intraventricular conduction disturbance. At the time of electrophysiologic study, two patients had a control spontaneous sinus cycle length that exceeded 1000 msec. Following propranolol, the mean spontaneous cycle length increased by 17.4% (924 to 1085 msec, P less than 0.005) and spontaneous second degree SA block reappeared in the one patient. The maximum escape cycle ranged from 116% to 229% of the prepacing spontaneous cycle length and was considered to be prolonged in two of ten patients. Propranolol had no significant effect on the maximum escape cycle/prepacing cycle length X 100 (%). The estimated sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) was determined in seven patients and ranged in value from 120 to 238 mes. Propranolol increased the mean value of the estimated SACT from 179 to 213 msec, P less than 0.025. Propranolol may cause marked bradyarrhythmias in some patients with sinus node dysfunction, and should be used with caution in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Ishikawa, S. Sumita, K. Kimura, M. Kikuchi, M. Kosuge, T. Endo, T. Sugano, T. Sigemasa, T. Usui, and S. Umemura
Sinus node recovery time assessment by the overdrive suppression test employing an intravenous injection of disopyramide phosphate
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. H. Falk
Proarrhythmia in Patients Treated for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter
Ann Intern Med, July 15, 1992; 117(2): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
N. Belie and J. V. Talano
Current Concepts in Sick Sinus Syndrome: I. Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacologic Causes
Arch Intern Med, March 1, 1985; 145(3): 521 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. A. Alpert and G. C. Flaker
Arrhythmias Associated With Sinus Node Dysfunction: Pathogenesis, Recognition, and Management
JAMA, October 28, 1983; 250(16): 2160 - 2166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. B. Chokshi, H. S. Friedman, M. Malach, B. C. Vasavada, and S. J. Bleicher
Impact of Peer Review in Reduction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations
JAMA, August 14, 1981; 246(7): 754 - 757.
[Abstract] [PDF]