Circulation, Vol 54, 452-459, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association
HC Strauss, M Gilbert, RH Svenson, HC Miller and AG Wallace
The electrophysiologic effects of intravenously administered propranolol
(0.1 mg/kg) on three parameters of sinus node function were examined in ten
symptomatic patients with sinus node dysfunction. The patients ranged in
age from 26 to 79 years. Symptoms ranged from fatigue to frank syncope.
Sinoatrial (SA) block and sinus pauses were observed in one patient; sinus
pauses alone were observed in three patients. Five (5/10) patients had
intraatrial block; three (3/10) patients had atrioventricular block; four
(4/10) patients had an intraventricular conduction disturbance. At the time
of electrophysiologic study, two patients had a control spontaneous sinus
cycle length that exceeded 1000 msec. Following propranolol, the mean
spontaneous cycle length increased by 17.4% (924 to 1085 msec, P less than
0.005) and spontaneous second degree SA block reappeared in the one
patient. The maximum escape cycle ranged from 116% to 229% of the prepacing
spontaneous cycle length and was considered to be prolonged in two of ten
patients. Propranolol had no significant effect on the maximum escape
cycle/prepacing cycle length X 100 (%). The estimated sinoatrial conduction
time (SACT) was determined in seven patients and ranged in value from 120
to 238 mes. Propranolol increased the mean value of the estimated SACT from
179 to 213 msec, P less than 0.025. Propranolol may cause marked
bradyarrhythmias in some patients with sinus node dysfunction, and should
be used with caution in these patients.
ARTICLES
Electrophysiologic effects of propranolol on sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ishikawa, S. Sumita, K. Kimura, M. Kikuchi, M. Kosuge, T. Endo, T. Sugano, T. Sigemasa, T. Usui, and S. Umemura Sinus node recovery time assessment by the overdrive suppression test employing an intravenous injection of disopyramide phosphate Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 54 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Falk Proarrhythmia in Patients Treated for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter Ann Intern Med, July 15, 1992; 117(2): 141 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Belie and J. V. Talano Current Concepts in Sick Sinus Syndrome: I. Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacologic Causes Arch Intern Med, March 1, 1985; 145(3): 521 - 523. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Alpert and G. C. Flaker Arrhythmias Associated With Sinus Node Dysfunction: Pathogenesis, Recognition, and Management JAMA, October 28, 1983; 250(16): 2160 - 2166. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Chokshi, H. S. Friedman, M. Malach, B. C. Vasavada, and S. J. Bleicher Impact of Peer Review in Reduction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations JAMA, August 14, 1981; 246(7): 754 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1976 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |