Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1976;54:951-956

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocchini, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nadas, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rocchini, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nadas, A. S.

Circulation, Vol 54, 951-956, Copyright © 1976 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Hemodynamics after surgical repair with right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit

AP Rocchini, A Rosenthal, JF Keane, AR Castaneda and AS Nadas

To assess the results of cardiac repair utilizing a right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduit, we reviewed postoperative hemodynamic data in 16 patients catheterized 0.5 to 5 years after repair. In 12 patients, a Hancock conduit (dacron conduit with porcine valve) was used; the conduit in the remaining four patients was made with an aortic homograft. All patients in whom an aortic homograft was utilized developed severe obstruction and calcification of their graft. The majority of patients, 9/12, with a Hancock conduit, had only mild to moderate conduit obstruction; the remaining three had severe obstruction (gradients greater than 70 mm Hg). The sites of Hancock conduit obstruction were at the distal end of the conduit in 8/12, proximal end of conduit in 6/12, and at the porcine valve in 4/12 patients. The data suggest that repair with a Hancock conduit is hemodynamically more satisfactory than with aortic homograft.