Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1977;55:134-141

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kisslo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Behar, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kisslo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Behar, V. S.

Circulation, Vol 55, 134-141, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A comparison of real-time, two dimensional echocardiography and cineangiography in detecting left ventricular asynergy

JA Kisslo, D Robertson, BW Gilbert, O von Ramm and VS Behar

Left ventricular wall motion was assessed in 105 consecutive patients both invasively, using biplane cineangiography, and noninvasively, by a real-time, phased-array, two-dimensional echocardiography system. Ventricular wall motion in five anatomic areas of the ventricle (anterolateral, posterolateral, apical, septal, and inferior) was analyzed by both methods in a double-blind manner. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were deemed adequate for analysis in 82% of the regions (430 of 525). Fifty-five discrepancies were noted in the comparison of the remaining 430 regions. The reasons for discrepancies in interpretation between the two methods were established for 54 during retrospective review: 33 were due to echocardiography (inadequate target visualization, observer error, or tangential echo views). Fifteen were related to angiography (overlay of silhouettes or observer error), and six were due to other reasons including definition problems or spatial orientation difficulties. Both real-time, two- dimensional echocardiography and cineangiography have advantages and disadvantages. The techniques used together could provide more complete information concerning ventricular wall movement than is now currently available.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. Palmieri, P. M. Okin, J. N. Bella, E. Gerdts, K. Wachtell, J. Gardin, V. Papademetriou, M. S. Nieminen, B. Dahlof, and R. B. Devereux
Echocardiographic Wall Motion Abnormalities in Hypertensive Patients With Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study
Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. V. Nixon
Left Ventricular Mural Thrombus
Arch Intern Med, August 1, 1983; 143(8): 1567 - 1571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. L. POPP, D. S. RUBENSON, C. R. TUCKER, and J. W. FRENCH
Echocardiography: M-Mode and Two-Dimensional Methods
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1980; 93(6): 844 - 856.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. I. SHINE, J. K. PERLOFF, J. S. CHILD, R. C. MARSHALL, and H. SCHELBERT
Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Function
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1980; 92(1): 78 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]