This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dhingra, R. C. Articles by Rosen, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dhingra, R. C. Articles by Rosen, K. M.

Circulation, Vol 55, 8-15, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Clinical significance of prolonged sinoatrial conduction time

RC Dhingra, F Amat-y-Leon, C Wyndham, PC Deedwania, D Wu, P Denes and KM Rosen

Prolonged (greater than 152 msec) calculated sinoatrial conduction times (SACT) were found in 24 of 470 patients studied by the atrial extrastimulus technique, ranging from 155 to 220 msec (180+/-4.4; mean+/-SEM). There were 18 males and six females with ages of 29 to 85 (mean 65+/-2.6). Electrocardiographic monitoring revealed significant sinus or atrial dysrhythmias in 19 (79%) patients. Of these 19, 15 had persistent sinus bradycardia and/or sinoatrial block, three had sinus bradyarrhythmia with paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, and one had isolated atrial tachycardia. Additional electrophysiological evidence of sinus node or atrial dysfunction was present in 11 patients. Four patients needed permanent pacing during follow-up (mean follow-up period of 427+/-39 days) because of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Three patients died, none suddenly. In conclusion, prolonged calculated SACT was associated with a high incidence of electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic abnormalities of sinus node and/or atrium. Despite this, bradyarrhythmic morbidity was relatively low, suggesting that prolonged sinoatrial conduction time in the absence of symptoms is not an indication for prophylactic pacing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Denes, E. Uretz, M. D. Ezri, and J. Borbola Clinical Predictors of Electrophysiologic Findings in Patients With Syncope of Unknown Origin Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1988; 148(9): 1922 - 1928. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Recording and Stimulation Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1984; 100(3): 452 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. K. Kwoh, J. R. Beck, and S. G. Pauker Repeated Syncope with Negative Diagnostic Evaluation: To Pace or Not To Pace? Med Decis Making, January 1, 1984; 4(3): 351 - 377. [PDF]

				M. A. Alpert and G. C. Flaker Arrhythmias Associated With Sinus Node Dysfunction: Pathogenesis, Recognition, and Management JAMA, October 28, 1983; 250(16): 2160 - 2166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Bower Sick Sinus Syndrome Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1978; 138(1): 133 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]