This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wyndham, C. Articles by Rosen, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wyndham, C. Articles by Rosen, K. M.

Circulation, Vol 55, 260-267, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Effects of cycle length on atrial vulnerability

CRC Wyndham, F Amat-y-Leon, D Wu, P Denes, R Dhingra, R Simpson and KM Rosen

The effect of cycle length on atrial vulnerability was studied in 14 patients manifesting reproducible repetitive atrial firing during atrial extra-stimulus (A2) testing. Repetitive atrial firing was defined as the occurrence of two or more premature atrial responses with return cycle (A2-A3) of 250 msec or less and subsequent mean cycle length of 300 msec or less, following A2. The zone of repetitive atrial firing could be defined in terms of its longest and shortest A1-A2 coupling intervals. Each patient was tested at a long cycle length (CL1) (mean 884 msec) and a short cycle length (CL2) (mean 557 msec). CL1 was sinus rhythm and CL2, an atrial paced rhythm. Repetitive atrial firing occurred in two patients at CL1 and in all patients at CL2. Of the former two patients (group 2), the zone of repetitive atrial firing was markedly widened in one at CL2 due to a shortening of atrial functional refractory period (FRP) at CL2. In the other, zone of repetitive atrial firing could not be totally defined due to induction of sustained atrial flutter preventing definition of atrial FRP. The occurrence of repetitive atrial firing at only CL2 in 12 patients (group 1) reflected: 1) a shortening of atrial FRP from 294 +/- 11 msec at CL1 to 242 +/- 10 msec at CL2 (mean +/- SEM; P less than 0.01), allowing delivery of A2 at shorter coupling intervals (9); 2) the new occurrence of repetitive atrial firing at A1-A2 coupling intervals achievable at both cycle lengths (1); or 3) both effects (2). In conclusion, decrease of cycle length potentiated atrial vulnerability. This demonstration implies that atrial pacing could potentiate occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. A. Centurion, A. Shimizu, S. Isomoto, and A. Konoe Mechanisms for the genesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the Wolff--Parkinson--White syndrome: intrinsic atrial muscle vulnerability vs. electrophysiological properties of the accessory pathway Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 294 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Shimizu and O. A. Centurion Electrophysiological properties of the human atrium in atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 302 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Shirayama, H. Shiraishi, S. Yoshida, Y. Matoba, H. Imai, and M. Nakagawa Atrial fibrillation threshold predicted long-term efficacy of pharmacological treatment of patients without structural heart disease Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(4): 383 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. G. Debbas, S. H. D. Jackson, D. de Jonghe, A. Robert, and A. J. Camm Human atrial repolarization: effects of sinus rate, pacing and drugs on the surface electrocardiogram J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 358 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Yoshida, H. Ikeda, T. Hiraki, I. Kubara, M. Ohga, and T. Imaizumi Detection of concealed left sided accessory atrioventricular pathway by P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 55 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Friedman, B. Sinha, A. Tun, R. Pasha, A. Sharafkhaneh, and A. Bharadwaj Zones of Atrial Vulnerability: Relationships to Basic Cycle Length Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1456 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text]