Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1977;55:509-512

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lakatta, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lakatta, E. G.

Circulation, Vol 55, 509-512, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Distance correction for precordial electrocardiographic voltage in estimating left ventricular mass: an echocardiographic study

JD Horton, HS Sherber and EG Lakatta

This study was undertaken to assess both the relation between echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular (LV) mass and commonly used electrocardiographic criteria for LV hypertrophy and the effect of the distance from the center of LV mass to the anterior chest wall on precordial voltage. Echocardiograms and standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained on 100 persons, ages 3 to 79. The correlation coefficients of echocardiographically determined LV mass with ECG precordial voltage (SV1 + RV5 or V6), the Estes point score system, and a VL4 wave voltage were .686, .721, and .531, respectively. Extrapolating from the dipole nature of the heart, the precrodial voltage was multiplied by the square of the chest wall to mid-LV distance to correct for the loss of energy across the distance from LV to recording electrode. Utilizing this correction, a much improved precordial voltage estimation of LV mass (r = .846) was obtained. We conclude that the distance of the center of LV mass from the chest wall influences the amplitude of recorded precordial voltage and that correction for this influence improved the correlation of precordial voltage with LV mass.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. M. Okin, S. Jern, R. B. Devereux, S. E. Kjeldsen, B. Dahlof, and f. t. L. S. Group
Effect of Obesity on Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients : The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]