Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1977;55:728-732

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foerster, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foerster, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, D. T.

Circulation, Vol 55, 728-732, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Evaluation of precordial orthogonal vectorcardiographic lead ST-segment magnitude in the assessment of myocardial ischemic injury

JM Foerster, Z Vera, DA Janzen, SJ Foerster and DT Mason

Relationship has been established between epicardial ST-segment elevation, considered a reliable estimate of ischemic injury in experimental myocardial damage, and ST changes by multiple-lead precordial electrocardiography. However, 35-lead precordial mapping is time-consuming and suitable only for anterior infarctions. An alternate, more rapid method for recording ST segments is an external 3- lead orthogonal vectorcardiographic (VCG) system which also can assess the entire ventricle. Accordingly, validity of VCG ST magnitude was evaluated by direct comparison with changes in epicardial ST magnitude (EST) induced by occlusion of major coronary arteries, reperfusion, and pharmacologic interventions in 15 closed-chest dogs. A total of 404 data points (average 27/dog), 20 epicardial grid and 3 Frank XYZ leds each, demonstrated close correlation (least squares linear regression) between VCG ST and EST changes (r = 0.921 +/- 0.02 SEM). These data document the accuracy of precordial VCG ST in noninvasive assessment of ischemic injury in various areas of myocardium and its practicality for clinical application.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. J.J. Wellens and A. P. Gorgels
The Electrocardiogram 102 Years After Einthoven
Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 562 - 564.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. E. RUDE, J. E. MULLER, and B. EUGENE
Efforts to Limit the Size of Myocardial Infarcts
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1981; 95(6): 736 - 761.
[Abstract] [PDF]