This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bush, C. A. Articles by Kilman, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bush, C. A. Articles by Kilman, J. W.

Circulation, Vol 56, 924-930, Copyright © 1977 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Occult constrictive pericardial disease. Diagnosis by rapid volume expansion and correction by pericardiectomy

CA Bush, JM Stang, CF Wooley and JW Kilman

Significant pericardial disease can exist without overt manifestations. Occult constrictive pericardial disease (OCPD) is identified by normal baseline hemodynamics and normal left ventricular systolic function with a characteristic response to rapid volume infusion. Following the intravenous administration of 1000 ml of normal saline over six to eight minutes, striking elevations of filling pressures are seen; however, diagnosis depends specifically upon a) the development of typical pressure pulse morphology of constriction, b) loss or reversal or respiratory variation of right atrial pressure, and c) precise diastolic equilibration of intracardiac pressures. Nineteen patients with OCPD have been identified in a five year period. Unexplained fatigue, dyspnea and chest pain was the uniform pattern of presentation. Eleven have undergone pericardiectomy resulting in a dramatic symptomatic improvement in all. Each demonstrated gross and/or microscopic evidence of pericardial disease. Recatheterization with volume infusion in five patients following pericardiectomy has revealed return to normal or near normal hemodynamics. This study describes the method for diagnosis of OCPD and recommends pericardiectomy for the management of disabling symptoms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Talreja, R. A. Nishimura, J. K. Oh, and D. R. Holmes Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era: Novel Criteria for Diagnosis in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 22, 2008; 51(3): 315 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Little and G. L. Freeman Pericardial Disease Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1622 - 1632. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Sagrista-Sauleda Pericardial constriction: uncommon patterns Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 257 - 258. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Mangi and D. F. Torchiana Pericardial Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1359 - 1372. [Full Text]

				E W. Hancock CARDIOMYOPATHY: Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 343 - 349. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Oh, A. J. Tajik, C. P. Appleton, L. K. Hatle, R. A. Nishimura, and J. B. Seward Preload Reduction to Unmask the Characteristic Doppler Features of Constrictive Pericarditis: A New Observation Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 796 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. G. Pauker, R. I. Kopelman, and R. M. Lechan Diverted by the Chief Complaint N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 1995; 333(1): 45 - 48. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Thomas and M. M. LeWinter Pericardial Disease in the Intensive Care Setting J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 1987; 2(1): 33 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]