Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1978;57:326-332

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jengo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Criley, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jengo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Criley, J. M.

Circulation, Vol 57, 326-332, Copyright © 1978 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Evaluation of left ventricular function (ejection fraction and segmental wall motion) by single pass radioisotope angiography

JA Jengo, I Mena, A Blaufuss and JM Criley

Changes in ejection fraction (EF) and segmental wall motion (SWM) have been shown to be sensitive indicators of left ventricular (LV) function. This information is only obtainable by contrast angiography or gated blood pool scans. Gated studies assume a fixed geometry for the LV for EF determinations, are lengthy and limited primarily to the LAO projection. We correlated contrast and Tc-99m pertechnetate angiograms by singl pass radioisotope angiography (immediately preceding the contrast study) in 12 patients. EF was calculated from the LV time/activity curve and values ranged from .21 to .72. Angiographic correlation yielded r = 0.97. Regional LV wall motion was evaluated by dividing a summated cardiac cycle into 16 frames and dynamically and sequentially displaying these frames. Regional wall motion evaluation of four LV quadrants correlated well with angiography (r = 0.97). For quantitation these images were divided into four anterior and four inferior segments and the areas of respective segments were compared and expressed as a shortening fraction. SWM compared favorably with angiographic determinations (r ranged from 0.70 to 0.99). Thus, single pass radioisotopic determinations of EF and SWM in the RAO projection correlated well with the angiographic values and provide essential quantitative information of LV function otherwise unobtainable at the bedside.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. L. Sacher, M. L. Sacher, S. W. Landau, K. A. Dietrich, A. Chien, and F. Dooley
First-Pass Radionuclide Cineangiography: A Reevaluation of Its Sensitivity and Limitations in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease
Angiology, June 1, 1992; 43(6): 470 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. P. Harley, I. Mena, R. Miranda, and R. J. Nelson
Myocardial Dysfunction Following Blunt Chest Trauma
Arch Surg, December 1, 1983; 118(12): 1384 - 1387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. I. SHINE, J. K. PERLOFF, J. S. CHILD, R. C. MARSHALL, and H. SCHELBERT
Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Function
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1980; 92(1): 78 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]