Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1978;57:590-593

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anbe, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anbe, D. T.

Circulation, Vol 57, 590-593, Copyright © 1978 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Exploration of the cause of the low intensity aortic component of the second sound in nonhypotensive patients with poor ventricular performance

PD Stein, HN Sabbah, F Khaja and DT Anbe

This investigation was undertaken to explore the cause of the diminished second sound (S2) that may occur in normotensive patients with poorly performing ventricles. Intra-aortic sound and pressure were measured in 16 patients with angina; eight had normal ventricular performance (ejection fraction greater than or equal to 60%) and eight had poor performance (ejection fraction less than 50%). The amplitude of S2 was lower in patients with poor ventricular performance as was negative d/dt. Aortic pressure was conparable in both groups. The ampitude of S2 was linearly related to the rate of change of the pressure gradient that developed across the aortic valve during diastole (r = 0.82). The latter also correlated with negative dp/dt (r = 0.82). These observations indicate that in patients with poor ventricular performance, isovolumic relaxation may be compromised. This would cause a reduction of the rate of development of the diastolic pressure gradient, which would result in a diminished S2.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Plicchi, E. Marcelli, M. Parlapiano, and T. Bombardini
PEA I and PEA II based implantable haemodynamic monitor: pre clinical studies in sheep
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 49 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. R. Manecke Jr., M. A. Nemirov, A. A. Bicker, R. N. Adsumelli, and P. J. Poppers
The Effect of Halothane on the Amplitude and Frequency Characteristics of Heart Sounds in Children
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 1999; 88(2): 263 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
P. D. Stein
What Is New In The Clinical Evaluation of Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease?
Angiology, June 1, 1982; 33(6): 401 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]