Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1978;57:991-995

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thanopoulos, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thanopoulos, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, A. R.

Circulation, Vol 57, 991-995, Copyright © 1978 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Right and left ventricular volume characteristics in common atrioventricular canal

BD Thanopoulos, EA Fisher, IW DuBrow and AR Hastreiter

Right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular volume characteristics were determined from biplane cineangiography in 29 patients with atrioventricular canal (AVC). The patients were classified into two groups: group I (N = 19), uncomplicated AVC; group II (N = 10), AVC associated with RV obstruction. In group I, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) [177 +/- 9 (SEM)% of normal] and RVEDV (125 +/- 9%) both were greater than normal (P is less than 0.001 and less than 0.01, respectively). LV ejection fraction (EF) was decreased (0.59 +/- 0.02, P is less than 0.001) but RVEF was normal (0.58 +/- 0.03). LV stroke volume index (SVI) was increased (48 +/- 3 ml/m2, P is less than 0.005), and RVSVI was normal (34 +/- 3 ml/m2). One patient had a markedly small RVEDV (45%). In group II, LVEDV and RVEDV were not different from normal (119 +/- 11% and 97 +/- 15%, respectively). LVEF was depressed (0.52 +/- 0.04, P is less than 0.001) and RVEF was normal (0.55 +/- 0.05). LVSVI was normal (38 +/- 5 ml/m2) and RVSVI was slightly decreased (29 +/- 4 ml/m2, P is less than 0.025). Two patients had a markedly small RVEDV (31%, 55%). EDV correlated with the pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (LV, r = 0.71; RV, r = 0.68). The data show that in most patients with AVC, LV and RV are enlarged in the uncomplicated form but not in the form with RV obstruction. LV function is more compromised than RV in both groups. RV hypoplasia is rare but was documented in both uncomplicated forms and forms with RV obstruction.