Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;59:991-1000

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelberg, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelberg, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, W. W.

Circulation, Vol 59, 991-1000, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: a comparison of area, chord and radial methods

HJ Gelberg, BH Brundage, S Glantz and WW Parmley

We were interested in divising a relatively simple quantitative technique that could be used on a routine clinical basis for wall motion analysis. Three quantitative methods of left ventricular (LV) regional analysis were compared in the 30 degrees right anterior oblique and 60 degrees left anterior oblique projection. The control group consisted of 17 patients with qualitatively normal LV wall motion; the abnormal group comprised 17 patients with at least one region of severe, qualitative wall motion abnormality. Normal regional values were determined for area, chord and radial methods by applying the techniques to the ventriculograms of the control group. Each technique was then applied to the abnormal group's ventriculograms to determine the percentage of qualitatively abnormal regions not detected by each method. The area method had the lowest failure rate (p less than 0.001) and the best separation of measured normal and abnormal regions' ejection changes (p less than 0.001), and best reflected symmetric uniform motion of the ventricular silhouette. We conclude that the area method, of the techniques examined, was best for the quantitative analysis of LV wall motion abnormalities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Yildirim, O. Soylu, B. Dagdeviren, A. Eksik, and T. Tezel
Sympathetic Overactivity in Patients With Left Ventricular Aneurysm in Early Period After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: Does Sympathetic Activity Predict Aneurysm Formation?
Angiology, June 1, 2007; 58(3): 275 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. V. Podgoreanu, G. N. Djaiani, E. Davis, B. Phillips-Bute, and J. P. Mathew
Quantitative Echocardiographic Assessment of Regional Wall Motion and Left Ventricular Asynchrony with Color Kinesis in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1294 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Kondo, A. Nakano, D. Saito, and Y. Shimono
Assessment of "microvascular no-reflow phenomenon" using technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy in patients with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 898 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]