Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1952;6:82-89

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CAPPS, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by PITTS, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CAPPS, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by PITTS, R. F.

(Circulation. 1952;6:82.)
© 1952 American Heart Association, Inc.


The Effect of Mercurial Diuretics on the Excretion of Water

J. N. CAPPS M.D.1; W. S. WIGGINS M.D.1; D. R. AXELROD M.D.1; R. F. PITTS M.D.1

1 From the Departments of Physiology and Medicine, State University Medical Center at Syracuse University, Syracuse, and the Department of Physiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, N. Y.

In experiments on 11 normal subjects and on three dogs it has been observed that mercurial diuretics do not prevent the stimulation of water absorption and formation of hypertonic urine which characteristically follows the infusion of Pitressin. Furthermore mercurial diuretics only rarely increase urine flow when administered in the course of maximal water diuresis. These two facts are interpreted as meaning that the diuretic agents have no primary effect on the reabsorption of water. Rather, increased urine flow results secondarily from increased elimination of ions.