Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;60:106-113

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, H. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angina

Circulation, Vol 60, 106-113, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Quantitative coronary angiography: measurement of the "critical" stenosis in patients with unstable angina and single-vessel disease without collaterals

MM McMahon, BG Brown, R Cukingnan, EL Rolett, E Bolson, M Frimer and HT Dodge

Quantitative angiographic assessment of proximal coronary artery stenosis was performed in 15 patients with consecutive presentations in two categories defined by clinical and angiographic criteria. Group 1 consisted of 10 patients who had new onset of refractory rest angina and ischemic ST-T changes, but no infarction, single-vessel coronary disease without collateralization, and normal left ventricular (LV) angiograms. Group 2 consisted of five patients who were similar to patients in group 1, but had subendocardial infarction (SEI). Quantitative coronary arteriography, using paired perpendicular angiographic views and digital computation, yielded statistically different lesion dimensions and hemodynamic predictions for the two groups. Minimum stenosis diameters were 0.88 +/- 0.14 (SD) and 0.64 +/- 0.08 mm, respectively, for groups 1 and 2. This corresponded to 72% and 78% diameter reduction and 92% and 95% cross-sectional area reduction for the two groups. These small dimensional differences among lesions in the two groups resulted in large differences in their hemodynamic impact as predicted from classic fluid mechanics theory. We conclude that there are characteristic lesion dimensions for the isolated "critical" stenosis in these selected patients with rest angina. Further small increases in lesions severity result in SEI. Certain practical applications and limitations of these observations are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Petropoulakis, M. K. Kyriakidis, C. A. Tentolouris, C. V. Kourouclis, and P. K. Toutouzas
Changes in Phasic Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Profile in Relation to Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters During Stress in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1437 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Takeda, M. Matsuda, T. Ogawa, R. Ajisaka, M. Kakihana, Y. Sugishita, I. Ito, M. Akisada, and T. Akatsuka
Evaluation of Myocardial Perfusion Abnormality by Profile Analysis for Digital Subtraction Angiogram
Angiology, March 1, 1989; 40(3): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]