This Article Order Full text via Infotrieve Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brewster, D. C. Articles by Darling, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brewster, D. C. Articles by Darling, R. C.

Circulation, Vol 60, 120-124, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Femoral artery pressure measurement during aortography

DC Brewster, AC Waltman, PJ O'Hara and RC Darling

Femoral artery pressure (FAP) measurements were carried out to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of aorto-iliac occlusive disease in 150 patients (173 limbs) at the time of transfemoral angiography. Clinical assessment based upon traditional criteria of claudication level, pulse examination, and monoplane angiography were at variance with the results of this physiologic testing in approximately one-third of the patients. Results were most variable, and FAP testing most helful in evaluating patients with moderate diffuse disease on angiography, who are usually difficult to evaluate clinically. Strong correlation existed between FAP evaluation and the results of arterial reconstructive surgery. Of the patients with a positive FAP result who underwent proximal vascular reconstruction, 96% had satisfactory relief of ischemic symptoms despite uncorrected distal disease in the majority. In contrast, 57% of the patients undergoing proximal operation despite a normal FAP result were unrelieved of symptoms and required subsequent distal procedures. Similar correlation existed with results of femoro-popliteal and femoro-femoral grafting. This simple physiologic test has been found of great value in selecting the proper level of arterial reconstruction and in accurately predicting the results of surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A Sanchez and F. J Veith Diagnosis and treatment of chronic lower extremity ischemia Vascular Medicine, November 1, 1998; 3(4): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. MacMillan, Se Do Cha, and V. Maranhao Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Nifedipine During Supine Exercise in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Angiology, March 1, 1986; 37(3): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Breslau, P. J. G. Jorning, and J. M. Greep Assessment of Aortoiliac Disease Using Hemodynamic Measures Arch Surg, September 1, 1985; 120(9): 1050 - 1052. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Brewster, B. A. Perler, J. G. Robison, and R. C. Darling Aortofemoral Graft for Multilevel Occlusive Disease: Predictors of Success and Need for Distal Bypass Arch Surg, December 1, 1982; 117(12): 1593 - 1600. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. F. Jones and R. F. Kempczinski Aortofemoral Bypass Grafting: A Reappraisal Arch Surg, March 1, 1981; 116(3): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. H. STONE, E. M. ANTMAN, J. E. MULLER, and E. BRAUNWALD Calcium Channel Blocking Agents in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders. Part II: Hemodynamic Effects and Clinical Applications Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1980; 93(6): 886 - 904. [Abstract] [PDF]