Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;60:16-22

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronenfeld, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronenfeld, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R. O., Jr

Circulation, Vol 60, 16-22, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Unstable angina pectoris: an examination of modes and costs of therapy

JJ Kronenfeld, ED Charles Jr, JB Wayne, A Oberman, NT Kouchoukos, WJ Rogers, JA Mantle, CE Rackley and RO Russell Jr

Debate exists over the most appropriate form of treatment for patients with unstable angina pectoris. This study examined 106 patients randomized at the University of Alabama in Birmingham as part of the National Cooperative Study Group and focuses on the phenomenon of patients who fail medical therapy and thus require late surgery, and the costs of therapy. Discriminant function analysis revealed that the significant predictors (p less than 0.01) of patients who would later require surgery were: total number of vessels diseased, angina severly, presence of congestive heart failure, hypertension, and number of years that the patient had had angina. By means of this analysis, 85% of the late surgery patients were correctly predicted. Late surgery patients averaged 2.4 diseased vessels vs 1.5 for persistent medical patients (p less than 0.01). Mean charges for the first 2 years in the study were $6,226 (SD $2,967) for persistent medical patients, $10,416 (SD $2,146) for surgery patients, and $20,059 (SD $10,748) for late surgery patients (p less than 0.001). These data indicate that surgery is clearly an expensive procedure; but that it is more expensive for late surgery patients, who have total costs that are twice as high as surgical costs and 3.5 times as high as persistent medical costs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. B. LEAHEY JR
Digoxin-Quinidine Interaction: Current Status
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1980; 93(5): 775 - 776.
[Abstract] [PDF]