Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;60:226-230

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sarnat, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sarnat, W.

Circulation, Vol 60, 226-230, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Factors influencing the success of ventricular defibrillation in man

RE Kerber and W Sarnat

To define the factors influencing the success of emergency ventricular defibrillation, we identified 52 patients defibrillated at the University of Iowa Hospital during 1974--1976. Thirty-eight patients were successfully defibrillated at least once; 14 could not be defibrillated, despite multiple attempts. Comparisons between these groups revealed no significant differences in body weight, heart weight, energy per kilogram of body weight and energy per gram of heart weight. Factors that militated against successful defibrillation included a prolonged delay before the first defibrillatory shock (successful 7 +/- 7 minutes (SD); unsuccessful 17 +/- 13 minutes, p less than 0.001), acidosis (successful pH 7.36 +/- 0.22; unsuccessful pH 7.23 +/- 0.12, p = 0.05) and hypoxia (successful PO2 100 + 98 torr; unsuccessful PO2 40 +/- 67 torr; p = 0.06). These three conditions tended to occur together in individual patients. Metabolic factors are important in determining defibrillation success; however, the role of high-energy doses is uncertain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. T. Leng, N. A. Paradis, H. Calkins, R. D. Berger, A. C. Lardo, K. C. Rent, and H. R. Halperin
Resuscitation After Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation With Use of Monophasic and Biphasic Waveform Pulses for External Defibrillation
Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2968 - 2974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. H. Bardy, F. E. Marchlinski, A. D. Sharma, S. J. Worley, R. M. Luceri, R. Yee, B. D. Halperin, C. L. Fellows, T. S. Ahern, D. A. Chilson, et al.
Multicenter Comparison of Truncated Biphasic Shocks and Standard Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks for Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2507 - 2514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]