Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1979;60:1308-1316

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mosslacher, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mosslacher, H.

Circulation, Vol 60, 1308-1316, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography

G Kronik, J Slany and H Mosslacher

Sixty-six consecutive patients without left ventricular volume overload, significant arrhythmia or significant pericardial effusion were examined by M-mode echocardiography immediately before diagnostic left- and right-heart catheterization. Using various echocardiographic measurements, left ventricular stroke volume (SV) was calculated according to eight different echocardiographic formulas (SVE) that have been proposed previously. At catheterization SV was also determined by thermodilution (SVT) and by single-plane left ventricular cineangiography in the right anterior oblique projection (SVA). When comparing SVE with SVT, the four formulas developed to calculate mitral or aortic flow failed (r = 0.10 to 0.54). As expected, poor correlations (r = 0.22 to 0.47) were also found when formulas used to calculate ventricular volumes from the ventricular diameter or SV from the change in diameter (left ventricular formulas) were used in coronary patients with grossly asymmetrical ventricular contraction patterns. When the use of the left ventricular formulas was confined to patients with symmetrical or almost symmetrical contraction, two formulas yielded favorable correlations of r = 0.84, SEE = 12.7 ml and r = 0.86, SEE = 12.2 ml, respectively. These correlations were comparable to the correlation between our two invasive reference techniques (r = 0.81; SEE = 12.2 ml). The comparison between SVE and SVA confirmed the results of the thermodilution study, though the correlations were generally weaker. We conclude that the formula of Teichholz et al., which was the best of all tested formulas, may be used to obtain a clinically useful estimate of SV in patients in whom symmetrical or almost symmetrical left ventricular contraction can be anticipated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Camposilvan, O. Milanesi, G. Stellin, A. Pettenazzo, L. Zancan, and L. D'Antiga
Liver and cardiac function in the long term after fontan operation.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 177 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
S. D.R. Thackray, G. A. Wright, K. K.A. Witte, N. P. Nikitin, A. C. Tweddel, A. L. Clark, and J. G.F. Cleland
The effect of ventricular pacing on measurements of left ventricular function: A comparison between echocardiographic methods and with radionuclide ventriculography
Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2006; 7(4): 284 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Palmieri, J. N. Bella, D. K. Arnett, J. E. Liu, A. Oberman, M.-Y. Schuck, D. W. Kitzman, P. N. Hopkins, D. Morgan, D. C. Rao, et al.
Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Left Ventricular Geometry and Systolic Function in Hypertensive Subjects : Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study
Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N.G Bellenger, M.I Burgess, S.G Ray, A Lahiri, A.J.S Coats, J.G.F Cleland, and D.J Pennell
Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable?
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2000; 21(16): 1387 - 1396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. B. Devereux, G. de Simone, T. G. Pickering, J. E. Schwartz, and M. J. Roman
Relation of Left Ventricular Midwall Function to Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Arterial Structure and Function
Hypertension, April 1, 1998; 31(4): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. de Simone, R. B. Devereux, S. R. Daniels, G. Mureddu, M. J. Roman, T. R. Kimball, R. Greco, S. Witt, and F. Contaldo
Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Normotensive Children and Adults : Assessment of Relations With Body Size and Impact of Overweight
Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1837 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. de Simone, R. B. Devereux, G. F. Mureddu, M. J. Roman, A. Ganau, M. H. Alderman, F. Contaldo, and J. H. Laragh
Influence of Obesity on Left Ventricular Midwall Mechanics in Arterial Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 1996; 28(2): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. R. Daniels, T. R. Kimball, P. Khoury, S. Witt, and J. A. Morrison
Correlates of the Hemodynamic Determinants of Blood Pressure
Hypertension, July 1, 1996; 28(1): 37 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text]