Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;61:388-394

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ubago, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ubago, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. G.

Circulation, Vol 61, 388-394, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Hemodynamic factors that affect calculated orifice areas in the mitral hancock xenograft valve

JL Ubago, A Figueroa, T Colman, A Ochoteco and CG Duran

From June 1974 to December 1978, 714 Hancock valves have been placed in 605 patients. One hundred seventy-five patients with a mitral xenograft have been restudied. The results were questionable due to the wide scatter and disparity between the calculated and the theoretical orifice of each valve size. To elucidate these differences, the hemodynamic data of 40 isolated, normal functioning mitral Hancock valves were reviewed. Early, middle and late diastolic mitral valve gradients were measured by planimetry and their corresponding flows were estimated by angiography. The paired data were fitted to exponential functions and specific lines for each Hancock valve size were obtained. By superimposing Gorlin's pressure and flow curves on these lines, the instantaneous effective orifice for each Hancock valve can be determined. We concluded that 1) the Hancock valve effective orifice is flow related and always lower than its theoretical opening; 2) normal function frequently cannot be firmly established by the mean effective area; and 3) the nomogram described may help in determining the time-related variations of a particular valve.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
S Takeda, H Rimington, and J Chambers
The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]