Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;61:536-542

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spurrell, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spurrell, R. A.

Circulation, Vol 61, 536-542, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Radionuclide and hemodynamic assessment of left ventricular functional reserve in patients with left ventricular aneurysm and congestive cardiac failure. Response to exercise stress and isosorbide dinitrate

JD Stephens, DS Dymond and RA Spurrell

The hemodynamic response to exercise stress was assessed in 17 patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysm, demonstrated by contrast left ventriculography, and congestive cardiac failure (CCF) before and after sublingual isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). Radionuclide ventriculography was performed at rest and during exercise in 14 patients. ISDN increased mean exercise LV stroke work index (LVSWI) from 31 to 39 g- m/m2 (p less than 0.001) and reduced mean exercise LV filling pressure from 38 to 25 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Using the combined criteria of LVSWI and ejection fraction of the contractile section of the left ventricle (EFCS), no patient with rest EFCS of less than 40% achieved a good absolute response to exercise in LV performance with or without ISDN. Of the six patients with rest EFCS greater than or equal to 40% only three achieved a good response. While rest EFCS less than 40% indicates poor LV functional reserve, good LV functional reserve is not always indicated by rest EFCS greater than or equal to 40%.