This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DeBusk, R. F. Articles by Haskell, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeBusk, R. F. Articles by Haskell, W.

Circulation, Vol 61, 738-743, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Symptom-limited vs heart-rate-limited exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction

RF DeBusk and W Haskell

To develop guidelines for exercise testing soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, 93 men completed a heart-rate-limited (HRL) protocol and 107 completed a symptom-limited (SXL) protocol 3 weeks after the acute event. In the HRL protocol, effort terminated at a heart rate of 130 beats/min in the absence of a limiting symptom, exertional hypotension or ventricular tachycardia. Peak heart rate was not an end point in the SXL protocol. Despite a higher peak heart rate and work load in patients who completed the SXL protocol, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity was similar in the two groups. No complications occurred with either protocol. Twelve patients (6%) had cardiac events within the next 2 months. Regardless of the test protocol used, early events were more common in patients with ischemic ST-segment responses (15%) than in patients without ischemic responses (3%) (p less than 0.01). In contrast, exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias were not predictive of early events. Eleven weeks after infarction, when all tests were SXL, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and premature ventricular complexes was similar to that at 3 weeks. We conclude that SXL and HRL exercise test protocols reveal a similar prevalence of ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Florenciano-Sanchez, J. A. Castillo-Moreno, E. Molina-Laborda, M. Jimenez-Pascual, P. Garcia-Urruticoechea, S. Egea-Beneyto, J. G. Sanchez-Villanueva, and J. Ortega-Bernal The exercise test that indicates a low risk of events: Differences in prognostic significance between patients with chronic stable angina and patients with unstable angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1974 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Jensen-Urstad, B A Samad, F Bouvier, J Hulting, J Hojer, H Ruiz, and M Jensen-Urstad Prognostic value of symptom limited versus low level exercise stress test before discharge in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytics Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 199 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L D Dugmore, R J Tipson, M H Phillips, E J Flint, N H Stentiford, M F Bone, and W A Littler Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and vocational status following a 12 month cardiac exercise rehabilitation programme Heart, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 359 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. S. Kotler and G. A. Diamond Exercise Thallium-201 Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1990; 113(9): 684 - 702. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. B. Baron, J. R. Licht, and M. H. Ellestad Status of Exercise Stress Testing After Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, March 1, 1984; 144(3): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. STARLING, M. H. CRAWFORD, G. T. KENNEDY, and R. A. O'ROURKE Treadmill Exercise Tests Predischarge and Six Weeks Post-myocardial Infarction to Detect Abnormalities of Known Prognostic Value Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1981; 94(6): 721 - 727. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Fein, N. A. Klein, and W. H. Frishman Exercise Testing Soon After Uncomplicated Myocardial Infarction: Prognostic Value and Safety JAMA, May 8, 1981; 245(18): 1863 - 1868. [Abstract] [PDF]