Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;61:1105-1112

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeWood, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ganji, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeWood, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ganji, J. H.

Circulation, Vol 61, 1105-1112, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation with and without reperfusion for myocardial infarction shock

MA DeWood, RN Notske, GR Hensley, JP Shields, WP O'Grady, J Spores, M Goldman and JH Ganji

Forty patients were treated for cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-one (group 1) were treated with intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and 19 (group 2) were treated with counterpulsation and coronary artery bypass grafting. The groups were similar in age, incidence of previous infarction, initial hemodynamics and coronary anatomy. The in-hospital mortality between group 1 (52.4%) and group 2 (42.1%) was not significantly different. The difference in long-term mortality between group 1 and group 2 was substantially different (71.4% vs 47.3%). The subset of group 2 (n = 12) that underwent reperfusion and counterpulsation within 16 hours from the onset of symptoms of infarction had a lower mortality (25.0%) than the subset (n = 7) that underwent operation more than 18 hours after the onset of symptoms (71.4%). The long-term mortality in the subset of group 2 patients operated on within 16 hours after the onset of infarction was significantly different from that in group 1 (25.0% vs 71.4%, p less than 0.03). The data suggest that reperfusion with counterpulsation is more effective when carried out early. Patients who develop shock more than 18 hours after the onset of symptoms of infarction appear to benefit most if treated with counterpulsation alone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
E. C. McGee Jr., P. M. McCarthy, and N. Moazami
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 507 - 534.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
I. George and M. C. Oz
Myocardial Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 669 - 696.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Thiele, R. W. Smalling, and G. C. Schuler
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2007; 28(17): 2057 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Thiele, P. Sick, E. Boudriot, K.-W. Diederich, R. Hambrecht, J. Niebauer, and G. Schuler
Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1276 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. C. Lee, M. C. Oz, A. D. Weinberg, and W. Ting
Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2003; 125(1): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. Moazami and P. M. McCarthy
Temporary Circulatory Support
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 495 - 520.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
D. C. Lee, W. Ting, and M. C. Oz
Myocardial Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 639 - 658.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Thiele, B. Lauer, R. Hambrecht, E. Boudriot, H. A. Cohen, and G. Schuler
Reversal of Cardiogenic Shock by Percutaneous Left Atrial-to-Femoral Arterial Bypass Assistance
Circulation, December 11, 2001; 104(24): 2917 - 2922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S G Williams, D J Wright, and L B Tan
Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice
Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 621 - 626.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
ReneG. Favaloro
Surgical treatment of acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5_Suppl_B): 18B - 24B.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Locker, I. Shapira, Y. Paz, A. Kramer, J. Gurevitch, M. Matsa, D. Pevni, and R. Mohr
Emergency myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: survival benefits of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 17(3): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. S. Hochman, L. A. Sleeper, J. G. Webb, T. A. Sanborn, H. D. White, J. D. Talley, C. E. Buller, A. K. Jacobs, J. N. Slater, J. Col, et al.
Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
N. Engl. J. Med., August 26, 1999; 341(9): 625 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. M. Hollenberg, C. J. Kavinsky, and J. E. Parrillo
Cardiogenic Shock
Ann Intern Med, July 6, 1999; 131(1): 47 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Mohr, Y. Moshkovitch, I. Shapira, G. Amir, H. Hod, and J. Gurevitch
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS WITHOUT CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS FOR PATIENTSWITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 50 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. J. Goldberg, N. A. Samad, J. Yarzebski, J. Gurwitz, C. Bigelow, and J. M. Gore
Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., April 15, 1999; 340(15): 1162 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. S. Mueller, K. Chatterjee, K. B. Davis, M. A. Fifer, C. Franklin, M. A. Greenberg, A. J. Labovitz, P. K. Shah, K. J. Tuman, M. H. Weil, et al.
Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 840 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. S. Hochman, J. Boland, L. A. Sleeper, M. Porway, J. Brinker, J. Col, A. Jacobs, J. Slater, D. Miller, H. Wasserman, et al.
Current Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock and Effect of Early Revascularization on Mortality : Results of an International Registry
Circulation, February 1, 1995; 91(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. M. Califf and J. R. Bengtson
Cardiogenic Shock
N. Engl. J. Med., June 16, 1994; 330(24): 1724 - 1730.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support
JAMA, October 28, 1992; 268(16): 2199 - 2241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. A. Matthay and K. Chatterjee
Bedside Catheterization of the Pulmonary Artery: Risks Compared with Benefits
Ann Intern Med, November 15, 1988; 109(10): 826 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. A. O'Shaughnessy, J. C. Ransbottom, B. S. Stiles, J. R. Stanford, and M. J. Mirro
Acute Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion: Survival Following Emergent Coronary Bypass
Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1987; 147(12): 2207 - 2208.
[Abstract] [PDF]