This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kannel, W. B. Articles by Gordon, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kannel, W. B. Articles by Gordon, T.

Circulation, Vol 61, 1183-1187, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Labile hypertension: a faulty concept? The Framingham study

WB Kannel, P Sorlie and T Gordon

Labile blood pressure elevation is believed to have less clinical significance than "fixed hypertension." This assertion was examined in the Framingham cohort of 5209 men and women followed for 20 years for the development of cardiovascular events in relation to three routinely measured blood pressures at each of 10 biennial examinations. Variability of pressure judged from the standard deviation about the mean of three pressures was not a consistent characteristic of subjects from one examination to the next (r = 0.07). Higher pressures were more labile than low ones, so that "fixed hypertensives" actually had more labile pressures than did so-called labile hypertensives. Lability, also increased with age. Labile hypertension, determined during a 1- hour period of observation, adds nothing to the ability of the mean blood pressure to predict cardiovascular disease. The mean, minimum and maximum of three pressures measured during an examination were equally efficient predictors of cardiovascular disease. In multivariate analysis, for any given average pressure, risk of cardiovascular events was unaffected by the degree of variability of the pressure. It is recommended that the average of a series of pressures be used to determine risk, preferably over more than one examination.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kony, M. Zureik, C. Neukirch, B. Leynaert, D. Vervloet, and F. Neukirch Rhinitis Is Associated with Increased Systolic Blood Pressure in Men: A Population-based Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 538 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Grundy, G. J. Balady, M. H. Criqui, G. Fletcher, P. Greenland, L. F. Hiratzka, N. Houston-Miller, P. Kris-Etherton, H. M. Krumholz, J. LaRosa, et al. Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: Guidance From Framingham : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(18): 1876 - 1887. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Kannel Clinical Misconceptions Dispelled by Epidemiological Research Circulation, December 1, 1995; 92(11): 3350 - 3360. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. J. Materson Isolated Systolic Hypertension: Another Disincentive to Treatment Is Removed Arch Intern Med, October 10, 1994; 154(19): 2128 - 2129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Palatini, M. Penzo, A. Racioppa, E. Zugno, G. Guzzardi, M. Anaclerio, and A. C. Pessina Clinical Relevance of Nighttime Blood Pressure and of Daytime Blood Pressure Variability Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1992; 152(9): 1855 - 1860. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Benbassat and P. Froom Blood Pressure Response to Exercise as a Predictor of Hypertension Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1986; 146(10): 2053 - 2055. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. HORAN, H. L. KENNEDY, and N. E. PADGETT Do Borderline Hypertensive Patients Have Labile Blood Pressure? Ann Intern Med, April 1, 1981; 94(4_Part_1): 466 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Vaisrub Labile and Systolic Hypertension: A Reappraisal JAMA, March 27, 1981; 245(12): 1250 - 1250. [Abstract] [PDF]