Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;62:8-16

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherr, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherr, L.

Circulation, Vol 62, 8-16, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Digitalis and myocardial infarction in man

J Morrison, J Coromilas, M Robbins, L Ong, S Eisenberg, R Stechel, M Zema, P Reiser and L Scherr

The use of digitalis after acute myocardial infarction is controversial. The effect of digoxin on computer-quantitated thallium- 201 perfusion scintigrams (Tl-201), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), and percentage of abnormally contracting LV regions (% ACR) was determined in 23 patients. A correlation was established between creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release and initial radionuclide- gated blood pool wall motion estimates of EF (r = -0.73) and % ACR (r = 0.71). After radionuclide assessments, 14 patients received digoxin 18 +/- 23 hours (mean +/- SD) after the rise in CK-MB from baseline, while the remaining nine patients served as controls. In the control group, the mean EF was 0.33 +/- 0.12 on the first study and 0.30 +/- 0.08 on the second study (p = NS). In the digoxin group, the EF after digoxin administration (mean 0.33 +/- 0.11) was significantly different from the initial EF (mean 0.29 +/- 0.09, p less than 0.03); however, digoxin had no apparent effect on infarct size as assessed by sequential % ACR and Tl-201 perfusion data. These data indicate that digoxin resulted in a minimal but significant improvement in EF that did not occur at the expense of LV perfusion or regional wall motion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. T. Sodums, R. A. Walsh, and R. A. O'Rourke
Digitalis in Heart Failure: Farewell to the Foxglove?
JAMA, July 10, 1981; 246(2): 158 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. A. Fein, N. A. Klein, and W. H. Frishman
Exercise Testing Soon After Uncomplicated Myocardial Infarction: Prognostic Value and Safety
JAMA, May 8, 1981; 245(18): 1863 - 1868.
[Abstract] [PDF]