Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;62:680-687

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B. L.

Circulation, Vol 62, 680-687, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Ordering patterns and clinical impact of cardiovascular nuclear medicine procedures

L Goldman, AR Feinstein, WP Batsford, LS Cohen, A Gottschalk and BL Zaret

We analyzed the ordering and impact of the first 171 fee-for-service cardiovascular nuclear medicine procedures at one hospital. The ordering physicians said 72% of the study results were useful and 28% contributed to changes in patient management. Experienced cardiology reviewers, however, felt that only 65% of studies were appropriately ordered, that 97% of appropriately ordered studies provided potentially useful information, and that 12% of all studies made important contributions to appropriate changes in patient management. The revieweres were most likely to rate exercise thallium procedures and procedures ordered by physicians from distant hospitals as being appropriately ordered and having important clinical impact. We conclude that (1) ordering physicians and revieweres may disagree substantially in their estimates of the impact of a diagnostic test; and (2) although a test may yield important information in appropriate patients, its total clinical impact will depend on how often it is suitably ordered and used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G J Herder, H van Tinteren, E F Comans, O S Hoekstra, G J Teule, P E Postmus, U Joshi, and E F Smit
Prospective use of serial questionnaires to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in suspected lung cancer
Thorax, January 1, 2003; 58(1): 47 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. M. Giardiello, J. D. Brensinger, G. M. Petersen, M. C. Luce, L. M. Hylind, J. A. Bacon, S. V. Booker, R. D. Parker, and S. R. Hamilton
The Use and Interpretation of Commercial APC Gene Testing for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 1997; 336(12): 823 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]