Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;62:1196-1203

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langou, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langou, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L. S.

Circulation, Vol 62, 1196-1203, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Predictive accuracy of coronary artery calcification and abnormal exercise test for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic men

RA Langou, EK Huang, MJ Kelley and LS Cohen

To determine the predictive accuracy of fluoroscopically detected coronary artery calcification (CAC) and a positive submaximal exercise test, 129 asymptomatic men were screened; 13 had both coronary artery calcification and positive exercise test (greater than or equal to 1.0 mm ST-segment depression). These 13 men were studied at coronary arteriography. They had a mean age of 44 years (range 41-56 years); none had history or symptoms of heat disease and all had normal resting ECGs at entry. CAC was detected in one artery in 10 men, in two arteries in two men, and in three arteries in one man. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was considered clinically significant if any major coronary branch was narrowed > 50%. Coronary arteriography revealed 12 men with clinically significant CAD (one-vessel CAD in four, two-vessel CAD in five and three-vessel CAD in three men) and one man with minor one-vessel CAD. The predictive accuracy was 100% for minor CAD and 92% for clinically significant CAD. The location of CAC and CAD correlated, but the absence of CAC did not rule out the presence of CAD at coronary arteriography. Furthermore, CAC did not indicate the location of the highest stenotic (most occlusive) lesions seen at arteriography. Follow- up for the 13 patients was 36 months; three patients developed typical angina and one patient developed a transmural myocardial infarction. This study suggests that the predictive accuracy of CAC and a positive exercise test in the middle-aged non-hyperlipidemic asymptomatic male is very high (100% for CAD and 92% for clinically significant CAD) and that CAC and a positive exercise test predict an early appearance of angina or myocardial infarction in previously asymptomatic men.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. C. Deedwania
Silent ischemia predicts poor outcome in high-risk healthy men
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2001; 38(1): 80 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A Enbergs, R Burger, H Reinecke, M Borggrefe, G Breithardt, and S Kerber
Prevalence of coronary artery disease in a general population without suspicion of coronary artery disease: angiographic analysis of subjects aged 40 to 70 years referred for catheter ablation therapy
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
Y. Nagai, E J. Metter, and J. L Fleg
Increased carotid artery intimal-medial thickness: risk factor for exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic older individuals
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 1999; 4(3): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Wexler, B. Brundage, J. Crouse, R. Detrano, V. Fuster, J. Maddahi, J. Rumberger, W. Stanford, R. White, and K. Taubert
Coronary Artery Calcification: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Imaging Methods, and Clinical Implications: A Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association
Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1175 - 1192.
[Full Text]