Circulation, Vol 63, 354-359, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association
PW Macfarlane, DI Melville, MR Horton and JJ Bailey
A comparison of two computer programs for ECG interpretation was
undertaken. Twelve-lead ECGs from 300 patients with various clinical
abnormalities were interpreted at the National Institutes of Health using
version 1 of the IBM program and corresponding orthogonal three- lead ECGs
were analyzed by the Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) program. Interpretations
were compared with respect to the clinical documentation, wherever
possible, and with each other directly in the case of diagnostic statements
for which non-ECG documentation was not available. The two programs had a
similar performance in determining abnormalities such as myocardial
infarction and ventricular hypertrophy. However, with respect to conduction
defects and ST-T-wave statements, certain discrepancies between the two
program performances were revealed. There were 222 disagreements between
various diagnostic statements. GRI was judged correct in 119 of these
disagreements and IBM in 70. In these 189 cases the disagreement could most
often be accounted for by different criteria and/or algorithms in the two
programs or by the use of different ECG lead sets. The remaining 33
disagreements had to be classified as inconclusive.
ARTICLES
Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G. Wannamethee, A. G. Shaper, and I. J. Perry Serum Creatinine Concentration and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease : A Possible Marker for Increased Risk of Stroke Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 557 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1981 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |