Circulation, Vol 63, 915-921, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association
GA Diamond, M Hirsch, JS Forrester, HM Staniloff, R Vas, SW Halpern and HJ Swan
The inherent imperfection of clinical diagnostic tests introduces
uncertainty into their interpretation. The magnitude of diagnostic
uncertainty after any test may be quantified by information theory. THe
information content of the electrocardiographic ST-segment response to
exercise, relative to the diagnosis of angiographic coronary artery
disease, was determined using literature-based pooled estimates of the
true- and false-positive rates for various magnitudes of ST depression from
less than 0.5 mm to greater than or equal to 2.5 mm. This analysis allows
three conclusions of clinical relevance. First, the diagnostic information
content of exercise-induced ST-segment depression, interpreted by the
standard 1.0-mm criterion, averages only 15% of that of coronary
angiography. Second, there is a 41% increase in information content when
the specific magnitude of ST-segment depression is analyzed, as opposed to
the single, categorical 1-mm criterion. Third, the information obtained
from ECG stress testing is markedly influenced by the prevalence of disease
in the population tested, being low in the asymptomatic and typical angina
groups and substantially greater in groups with nonanginal chest pain and
atypical angina. The quantitation of information has broad relevance to
selection and use of diagnostic tests, because one can analyze objectively
the value of different interpretation criteria, compare one test with
another and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of both a single test and
potential testing combination.
ARTICLES
Application of information theory to clinical diagnostic testing. The electrocardiographic stress test
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Abidov, A. Rozanski, R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, F. Aboul-Enein, I. Cohen, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. N. Engl. J. Med., November 3, 2005; 353(18): 1889 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W.F. Wilson CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Ability of Inflammatory Markers to Predict Disease in Asymptomatic Patients: A Background Paper Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e568 - e571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul Prior convictions: bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1929 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Hellstrom, A. Rozanski, J. A. Blumenthal, and J. Kaplan Psychological Factors and Ischemic Heart Disease Response Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101 (16): e177 - e178. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Guerci, Y. Arad, A. Agatston, R. Detrano, N.D. Wong, and T. Doherty Predictive Value of EBCT Scanning • Response Circulation, June 30, 1998; 97(25): 2583 - 2584. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1981 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |