This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hurd, H. P. Articles by O'Rourke, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hurd, H. P., 2d Articles by O'Rourke, R. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack

Circulation, Vol 63, 1025-1029, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Comparative accuracy of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for inferior myocardial infarction

HP Hurd 2d, MR Starling, MH Crawford, PW Dlabal and RA O'Rourke

Numerous criteria for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction by electrocardiogram (ECG) and vectorcardiogram (VCG) have been published, but they have not been subjected to a systematic, independent evaluation. Accordingly, we studied 146 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization; 63 were normal and 83 had a history of infarction, a significant right coronary lesion and an inferior wall motion abnormality (inferior infarction group). No ECG or VCG criteria were considered in the designation of the two groups; rather, three sets of ECG and VCG criteria were evaluated for this purpose. Specificity was excellent (98-100%) and sensitivity was poor (4-34%) by all three sets of ECG criteria, but the 1949 ECG criteria of Meyers et al. are the least sensitive (4%, p less than 0.001). Specificity (90- 100%) and sensitivity (82-84%) were very good by all three VCG criteria. The VCG criteria of Starr et al. gave no false-positive results in our normal group. Because of enhanced sensitivity, the overall accuracy of the VCG was higher than that of the ECG for the diagnosis of inferior infarction (90% vs 62%, p less than 0.001). We conclude that more recent ECG criteria for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction are highly specific, but insensitive compared with VCG criteria.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Morikawa, K. Kitamura, Y. Habuchi, N. Tanaka, Y. Nishimoto, M. Hirano, Y. Tsujimura, H. Hamamoto, and T. Takanashi Three-Dimensional Vectorcardiography (3-D VCG) by Computer Graphics in Old Myocardial Infarction Angiology, June 1, 1987; 38(6): 449 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Warner A New Method of Interpreting the Electrocardiogram Arch Intern Med, July 1, 1986; 146(7): 1427 - 1428. [Abstract] [PDF]