Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1981;63:1050-1055

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hakki, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brice, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hakki, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brice, C.

Circulation, Vol 63, 1050-1055, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A simplified valve formula for the calculation of stenotic cardiac valve areas

AH Hakki, AS Iskandrian, CE Bemis, D Kimbiris, GS Mintz, BL Segal and C Brice

We have simplified the Gorlin formula and have compared our measurements of the aortic or mitral valve area, using the original Gorlin formula and the simplified valve formula in 100 consecutive patients. The valve area was measured by the simplified formula as cardiac output (l/min) divided by the square root of pressure differences across the valve. In patients with aortic stenosis of varying severity there were excellent correlation between the original Gorlin formula and the simplified formula (r = 0.96, y = 0.99x + 0.01, SEE = +/- 0.10, p less than 0.001). The correlation was unchanged when the peak gradient was used instead of the mean gradient in the simplified formula. Excellent correlation was also seen in patients with mitral stenosis of varying severity (r = 0.94, y = 0.97x - 0.02, SEE = +/- 0.19; p less than 0.001). The simplicity of the formula makes it easy to memorize and use.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. L. Gutierrez-Chico, J. L. Zamorano, E. Prieto-Moriche, R. A. Hernandez-Antolin, M. Bravo-Amaro, L. Perez de Isla, M. Sanmartin-Fernandez, J. A. Baz-Alonso, and A. Iniguez-Romo
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1296 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J. L Wilkinson
CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Haemodynamic calculations in the catheter laboratory
Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 113 - 120.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Vaturi, A. Porter, Y. Adler, Y. Shapira, G. Sahar, B. Vidne, and A. Sagie
The natural history of aortic valve disease after mitral valve surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2003 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Dearani, T. A. Orszulak, R. C. Daly, M. R. Phillips, F. A. Miller, G. K. Danielson, and H. V. Schaff
Comparison of Techniques for Implantation of Aortic Valve Allografts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1996; 62(4): 1069 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. R. Holmes Jr, R. A. Nishimura, G. S. Reeder, P. J. Wagner, and D. M. Ilstrup
Clinical Follow-up After Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty
Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1989; 149(6): 1405 - 1409.
[Abstract] [PDF]