Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1981;64:409-420

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eraker, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eraker, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arrhythmia
Hazardous Substances DB
*DIGOXIN

Circulation, Vol 64, 409-420, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

The serum digoxin test and digoxin toxicity: a Bayesian approach to decision making

SA Eraker and L Sasse

The clinician may often be uncertain about the presence of digoxin toxicity. This uncertainty is particularly important when the clinician must make initial therapeutic decisions about continuing or discontinuing digoxin. We describe a method that helps to clarify the role of the serum digoxin test in decreasing the uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of toxicity. The relation between the test and toxicity was first determined in our patient population. An approach to the interpretation of the test based on the likelihood ratio was then developed by combining our data with selected data from the literature. The relation between the pretest risk of toxicity (the estimated risk of toxicity in the population under investigation before the test result is known) and the predictive value of the test was established. This relation was also used to analyze the importance of the degree of elevation of the test. The appropriate threshold probability for institution of treatment of toxicity was then determined by an interview technique. The test was able to make the patient's probability of toxicity cross the threshold probability for treatment of toxicity for an intermediate range of pretest risk. Our analysis suggests that the serum digoxin test may have a critical effect on therapeutic decisions and can be best considered as contributing to the spectrum of risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. P. KASSIRER, A. J. MOSKOWITZ, J. LAU, and S. G. PAUKER
Decision Analysis: A Progress Report
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1987; 106(2): 275 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. A. ERAKER and P. POLITSER
How Decisions are Reached: Physician and Patient
Ann Intern Med, August 1, 1982; 97(2): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]