Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1981;64:787-796

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. E.

Circulation, Vol 64, 787-796, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of verapamil on left ventricular systolic function and diastolic filling in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

RO Bonow, DR Rosing, SL Bacharach, MV Green, KM Kent, LC Lipson, BJ Maron, MB Leon and SE Epstein

Verapamil improves exercise capacity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but its mechanism of action are unknown. We examined the effects of oral verapamil (320-480 mg/day) on resting left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function in patients with HCM. High-temporal-resolution time-activity curves from gated technetium-99m radionuclide angiograms were analyzed before and after verapamil therapy in 40 patients, of whom 16 were also studied during propranolol therapy (80-960 mg/day). All but one patient had normal or supranormal systolic function, but 70% had evidence of diastolic dysfunction, defined as peak LV filling rate (PFR) less than 2.5 end-diastolic volumes (EDV)/sec or time to PFR greater than 80 msec. Verapamil did not change LV ejection fraction, peak ejection rate or ejection time, but did increase PFR (control 3.3 +/- 1.0 EDV/sec, verapamil 4.1 +/- 1.1 EDV/sec; p less than 0.001) and reduce time to PFR (control 187 +/- 56 msec, verapamil, 159 +/- 34 msec; p less than 0.001). Only 30% of patients had evidence of diastolic dysfunction during verapamil. In contrast, propranolol did not change LV ejection fraction, PFR or time to PFR, but did prolong ejection time and reduce peak ejection rate. Thus, LV diastolic filling is abnormal in a high percentage of patients with HCM, and verapamil normalizes or improves these abnormalities without altering systolic function. This mechanism may contribute to the clinical improvement of many HCM patients during verapamil therapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Fifer and G. J. Vlahakes
Management of Symptoms in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 429 - 439.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Isobe, H. Izawa, Y. Takeichi, M. Nonokawa, M. Nanasato, A. Ando, K. Kato, M. Ikeda, T. Murohara, and M. Yokota
Relationship Between Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia and Reduced Left Ventricular Distensibility in Patients with Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1717 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. J. Maron
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review
JAMA, March 13, 2002; 287(10): 1308 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Takeichi, M. Yokota, M. Iwase, H. Izawa, T. Nishizawa, R. Ishiki, F. Somura, K. Nagata, S. Isobe, and A. Noda
Biphasic changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during dynamic exercise in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Nakajima, J. Taki, M. Kawano, T. Higuchi, S. Sato, C. Nishijima, K. Takehara, and N. Tonami
Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Detected by Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: An Early Sign of Cardiac Involvement
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 183 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Spirito, C. E. Seidman, W. J. McKenna, and B. J. Maron
The Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., March 13, 1997; 336(11): 775 - 785.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. H. Pak, W. L. Maughan, K. L. Baughman, and D. A. Kass
Marked Discordance Between Dynamic and Passive Diastolic Pressure-Volume Relations in Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, July 1, 1996; 94(1): 52 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. O. Cannon, A. A. Quyyumi, R. Mincemoyer, A. M. Stine, R. H. Gracely, W. B. Smith, M. F. Geraci, B. C. Black, T. W. Uhde, M. A. Waclawiw, et al.
Imipramine in Patients with Chest Pain Despite Normal Coronary Angiograms
N. Engl. J. Med., May 19, 1994; 330(20): 1411 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
O. Lund and F. T. Jensen
Late Cardiac Deaths After Isolated Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis. Relation to Impaired Left Ventricular Diastolic Performance
Angiology, March 1, 1989; 40(3): 199 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]