Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1981;64:945-951

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeppson, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klausner, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeppson, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klausner, S. C.

Circulation, Vol 64, 945-951, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Changes in left ventricular wall motion after coronary artery bypass surgery: signal or noise?

GM Jeppson, PD Clayton, TJ Blair, HV Liddle, RL Jensen and SC Klausner

We evaluated changes in ventricular wall motion after surgery by comparing smoothed, filtered measurements of regional percent shortening (RPS) from right anterior oblique ventriculograms in 37 patients before and after surgery. After surgery there was a significant (p less than 0.05) decrease in the number of regions with hypokinetic wall motion. The distribution of RPS values was also different (p less than 0.005). However, the mean value of RPS for the surgery group as a whole was not significantly altered. These data were contrasted with RPS data from 11 control patients, who were each studied twice but did not have surgical intervention. Similar analysis of the control group did not show any significant change between studies in the number of hypokinetic regions, and the distributions of RPS for the first and second angiograms were not different. We found a 10.3% absolute mean change in repeated measurements of RPS in the control group. We conclude that significant changes occurred after surgery that were not evident in the control group, and the amount of variability in repeated measurements of RPS suggests that analysis should be applied to group rather than individual data.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Salati, M. Lemma, D. G. Di Mattia, P. Danna, A. Cialfi, A. Salvaggio, and C. Santoli
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Functional Observations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1728 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text]