Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1982;65:764-771

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Missirlis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Missirlis, E.

Circulation, Vol 65, 764-771, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Intravenous hyaluronidase therapy for myocardial infarction in man: double-blind trial to assess infarct size limitation

JA Cairns, DA Holder, P Tanser and E Missirlis

Patients with their first myocardial infarction not initially complicated by severe atrioventricular block or power failure were given a skin test and then randomized to receive either hyaluronidase or placebo in double-blind fashion. Hyaluronidase, 500 IU/kg i.v., was given every 6 hours for 42 hours. Of the 48 eligible patients, 26 received hyaluronidase and 22 received placebo. The mean CK serum entry was 3140 +/- 2111 mIU/ml (mean +/- SD) in hyaluronidase patients and 3574 +/- 1476 mIU/ml in placebo patients (p less than 0.21). The mean infarct size was 54.6 +/- 35.8 CK gram-equivalents in the hyaluronidase patients and 64.0 +/- 31.1 CK gram-equivalents in the placebo patients (p less than 0.20). Among the 21 patients treated within 6 hours of the onset of infarction, the difference in infarct size was greater (p less than 0.15). There was no significant difference in the incidence of power failure, ventricular arrhythmias, recurrence of ischemic pain, infarct extension or mortality. No benefit of hyaluronidase was demonstrated in this study, which was designed to detect a 50% reduction of infarct size. However, to detect a 20% reduction in infarct size would require a much larger study population.