Circulation, Vol 65, 1004-1009, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association
LE Ginzton and MM Laks
We examined the quantitative electrocardiographic differentiation of acute
pericarditis from normal variant ST-T changes. The ECGs of 19 patients with
acute pericarditis were compared with those of 20 subjects with typical
normal variant changes. Patients were excluded if their ECGs demonstrated
conditions that markedly altered repolarization. The positive predictive
values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of previously reported
criteria were not high (PPV = 0.54-0.83, NPV = 0.56-0.58). In contrast, in
the present study, a T-wave amplitude in lead V6 of less than or equal to
0.3 mV diagnosed acute pericarditis (p less than 0.005, PPV = 0.85, NPV =
0.85), but there was overlap of patients between the groups. The ratio of
the amplitude of the onset of the ST segment to the amplitude of the T wave
in that lead (ST/T ratio in V6) proved to be the most reliable
discriminator. An ST/T ratio greater than or equal to 0.25 diagnosed all
patients with acute pericarditis (p less than or equal to 0.005, PPV = 1.0,
NPV = 1.0). The ST/T ratio greater than 0.25 in V4, V5 (both p less than
0.005, PPV = 0.87, NPV = 1.0) and I (p less than or equal to 0.005, PPV =
0.80, NPV = 0.81) were also significant discriminators. Thus, if V6 is
unavailable, an ST/T ratio greater than or equal to 0.24 in V5, V4 or I is
highly suggestive of acute pericarditis. An ST/T ratio greater than or
equal to 0.25 in V6 discriminated the ECGs of all patients with acute
pericarditis from normal variants in this study.
ARTICLES
The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: new electrocardiographic criteria
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Rautaharju, B. Surawicz, and L. S. Gettes AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST Segment, T and U Waves, and the QT Interval A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2009; 53(11): 982 - 991. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Rautaharju, B. Surawicz, and L. S. Gettes AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST Segment, T and U Waves, and the QT Interval: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): e241 - e250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Bainey and D. L. Bhatt Acute Pericarditis: Appendicitis of the Heart? Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2009; 84(1): 5 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Lewis, C. B. Holmes, G. Holmvang, and J. R. Butterton Case 8-2007 -- A 48-Year-Old Man with Chest Pain Followed by Cardiac Arrest N. Engl. J. Med., March 15, 2007; 356(11): 1153 - 1162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis Acute Pericarditis N. Engl. J. Med., November 18, 2004; 351(21): 2195 - 2202. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1982 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |